摘要
目的比较口服阿奇霉素与左氧氟沙星门诊治疗慢性支气管炎轻-中度急性发作的疗效和安全性。方法采用随机、开放、对照方法分为两组,共入选慢性支气管炎轻-中度急性发作门诊就诊者65例,阿奇霉素组32例(实际完成治疗30例),口服阿奇霉素500mg,1次/d,连续5d;左氧氟沙星组33例(实际完成治疗32例),口服左氧氟沙星500mg,1次/d,连续7d。结果治疗后第10天、第24天两组疗效比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组临床症状改善所需时间、平均症状严重程度评分比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组细菌清除率、非典型病原体感染率间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组不良反应发生率均较低,且差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论口服阿奇霉素5d与口服左氧氟沙星7d门诊治疗慢性支气管炎轻-中度急性加重均有效且安全。
Objective To compare the safety and efficacy of oral azithromycin and levofloxacin in the treatment of out-patients with mild or medium acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). Methods A randomized, open - label, con-trolled trial was conducted in sixty - five outpatients who had received a clinical diagnosis of AECB. Thirty two patients were treated with oral azithromycin, 500 mg qd for 5 days (acutely 30 patients completed the trial) , and 33 patients with oral levofloxacin, 500 mg qd for 7 days ( acutely 32 patients completed the trial). Results Between the two groups, there was no statistic significance in effect on the10 th days and 24th days after treatment ( P 〉0. 05), in both the necessary time for improvement of clinical symptoms and average score of symptom severity ( P 〉 0. 05 ) , and in bacterial eradication rate and infection rate of non - specific pathogens ( P 〉 0. 05 ). The adverse effect rate in both group was lower, with no significant difference ( P 〉 0. 05 ). Conclusion A 5 - day course of oral azithromycin and a 7 - day course of oral levofloxacin are both effective and safe in treatment of outpatients with mild or medium AECB.
出处
《中国全科医学》
CAS
CSCD
2008年第5期383-385,共3页
Chinese General Practice