期刊文献+

两大股权激励方式激励作用的比较研究--基于厌恶经理人的委托代理模型分析 被引量:6

A Comparative Research of the Incentive Effect of Two Stock Ownership Encouragement Means——An Analysis of Agency-by-mandate Model Based on Risk Averse Managers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 笔者采用委托代理模型,以股东为风险中性、经理人为风险厌恶为基本假设,分析了限制性股票和股票期权两种股权激励形式的激励作用。结果显示,当限制性股票无偿赠送给经理人时,股票期权的激励作用大于股票的激励作用;为激励经理人采取股东希望的行动,股票期权对股东的经济成本低于限制性股票对股东的经济成本。这一结论为我国股权分置改革后上市公司选择股权激励方式提供了一定的理论借鉴。 The author uses agency - by - mandate model, and taking stockholders as risk neutral and managers as risk averse, analyzes the encouragement effect of two means of stock ownership encouragement, restricted stock and stock option. The result shows that when restricted stocks are presented to managers without repay the encouragement effect of stock option is greater than that of stocks; to encourage managers to take the measures that stockholders hope for, the economic cost of stock option for stockholders is lower than that of restricted stocks for stockholders. This conclusion provides some theoretical reference for Chinese listed companies choosing stock ownership encouragement means after the equity division reform of our country.
作者 杨慧辉
出处 《经济经纬》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第2期109-113,共5页 Economic Survey
基金 上海市教委2005年度人文社会科学研究一般项目(05MS31) 2005年上海市高校选拔培养优秀青年教师科研专项基金的资助
关键词 限制性股票 股票期权 报酬—业绩敏感度 确定性等价 restricted stock stock option sensitivity to pay -performance certainty equivalent
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Fehham, G. and M. Wu. 2001. Incentive Efficiency of Stock Versus Options. Review of Accounting Studies [ J ]. (6).
  • 2Guay, W. R. 1999. The Sensitivity of CEO Wealth to Equity Risk: An Analysis of the Magnitude and Determinants [ J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 53.
  • 3Hall, B. J. and K. J. Murphy. 2000. Optimal Exercise Prices for Executive Stock Options [ J ]. American Econo - mics Review, 90(2).
  • 4Hall, B. J. and K. J. Murphy. 2002a. Stock Option for Undiversified Executives [ J ]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33 (2).
  • 5Jensen, M. C. and K. J. Murphy. 1990a. Performance Pay and Top - Management Incentives [ J ]. Journal of Political Economy, 98(2).
  • 6John, T. A. and Y. S. Tian. 2000a. The Value and Incentive Effects of Nontraditional Executive Stock Option Plans [ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics, 57.
  • 7Aseff, J. G. 2001. Essays on Managerial Compensation [ D ]. Axizona State University.
  • 8Oyer, P and Sehaefer, S. 2003. A Comparison of Options, Restricted Stock, and Cash for Employee Compensation [ R ]. Working Paper. Richard A. Lambert and David F. Lacker. 2004. Stock Options, Restricted Stock, and Incentives [ R ]. Working Paper.

同被引文献39

引证文献6

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部