期刊文献+

评估专家不完全模糊偏好信息的一种迭代估算方法

An Iterative Method for Estimating Missing Value in Incomplete Fuzzy Preference Relations
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对基于方案对比较的不完全模糊偏好信息的方案优选群决策问题,通过引入模糊偏好关系中的可加一致性概念,提出了一种估算评估专家缺失的偏好信息的迭代估算方法。该方法仅仅依赖专家在可加一致性和可加互补性基础上提供的信息,而不用考虑其他专家的信息,因而估算出来的偏好信息能够与专家原始偏好信息保持良好的一致性,从而提高了估算结果的可信度。最后给出了一个算例。 In this paper, an iterative method is proposed to deal with the group decision - making problem with incomplete fuzzy preference relations. The method is guided by additive consistency property and only uses the preference values provided by the experts without needing other information, and hence, the estimating results by the method is in good consistency with the experts' original preference and is more believable. Finally,a numerical example is presented to illustrate how to utilize the method proposed in this paper.
出处 《世界科技研究与发展》 CSCD 2008年第1期89-92,共4页 World Sci-Tech R&D
关键词 可加一致性 可加互补性 不完全模糊偏好 群决策 additive consistency additive reciprocal incomplete fuzzy preference relations group decision-making
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Herrera-Viedma E, F Chiclana, F Herrera, et al. Group decision-making model with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency[ J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part B-Cybernetics,2007,37 ( 1 ) :176 - 189
  • 2Kim Soung Hie, Sang Hyun Choi, Jae Kyeong Kim. An interactive procedure for multiple attribute group decision making with incomplete information : Range - based approach [ J ]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1999,118 ( 1 ) : 139 - 152
  • 3Kim Soung Hie, Byeong Seok Ahn. Interactive group decision making procedure under incomplete information [ J ]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1999,116 ( 3 ) :498-507
  • 4Kim Soting Hie,Chang Hee Hart. An interactive procedure for multi -attribute group decision making with incomplete information [ J ]. Computers & Operations Research, 1999,26 (8) :755-772
  • 5Kim Jae Kyeong,Sang Hyun Choi,Chang Hee Han,et al. An interactive procedure for multiple criteria group decision making with incomplete information[ J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 1998,35 ( 1 ) :295 -298
  • 6Xu Z S. Goal programming models for obtaining the priority vector of incomplete fuzzy preference relation[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning,2004,36 ( 3 ) :261 - 270
  • 7Fedrizzi Michele, Silvio Giove. Incomplete pairwise comparison and consistency optimization [ J ]. European Journal of Operational Research,2007,183 ( 1 ) :303 -313
  • 8徐泽水.基于残缺互补判断矩阵的交互式群决策方法[J].控制与决策,2005,20(8):913-916. 被引量:28
  • 9徐泽水.残缺互补判断矩阵[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004,24(6):93-97. 被引量:29
  • 10王国华,梁樑,熊立.多专家判断的模糊偏好信息集结规划方法[J].中国管理科学,2005,13(4):74-77. 被引量:10

二级参考文献43

  • 1徐泽水.残缺互补判断矩阵[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004,24(6):93-97. 被引量:29
  • 2[3]Orlovsky S A. Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1978, (1): 155-167.
  • 3[4]Tanino T. Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1984, (12): 117-131.
  • 4[5]Kacprzyk J. Group decision making with a fuzzy linguistic majority[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1986, (18): 105-118.
  • 5[13]Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E. Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1998, 97: 33-48.
  • 6[15]Lipovetsky S, Michael Conklin M. Robust estimation of priorities in the AHP[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 137: 110-122.
  • 7[19]Xu Z S, Da Q L. An approach to improving consistency of fuzzy preference matrix[J]. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 2003, 2(1): 3-12.
  • 8[20]Xu Z S, Da L. An uncertain ordered weighted geometric averaging (UOWGA) operator and its application[J]. Information: An International Journal, 2004,7(2):175-182.
  • 9徐泽水.FUZZY环境中群组AHP决策新方法研究[J].曲阜师范大学学报,1997,23:1-2.
  • 10Satty T.L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process[M] .New York: Mc Graw - Hill, 1980.

共引文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部