期刊文献+

证据开示的经济学逻辑

On the Economic Logic of the Evidence Discovery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 证据开示制度通过对证明信息的披露可以校正诉讼双方的信息不对称状态,提高庭审程序诉讼效率。同时,需要建立辅助的强制开示制度来完善证据开示制度。但在这样证据开示制度下的诉审双方博弈,将会出现强制开示滥用的情况。为此,应设立后置于开示程序的强制开示许可宣告制度,使法院能够引导两造运用强硬诉讼策略自行取证,化解法院职权取证的压力。 Through opening the proof information, the evidence discovery will do help to adjust asymmetrical state of information between the parties litigant and improve the litigation efficiency of contentious procedure. And it's also need to set up the compel discovery procedure to consummate the evidence discovery while it will lead to the abuse using of the compel discovery procedure through the litigants gambling. Therefore, the judges shall rule their permission to compel discovery after the evidence discovery procedure to make the litigants with the tough strategy to find the evidences and reduce the pressure of the court for the evidences investigating.
作者 陈慰星
机构地区 华侨大学法学院
出处 《华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2008年第1期77-83,共7页 Journal of Huaqiao University(Philosophy & Social Sciences)
基金 华侨大学科研基金资助项目(07HSK20)
关键词 审前程序 证据 信息 经济分析 pre-trial procedure evidence information economic approach
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1[美]波斯纳.证据法的经济分析[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2001.
  • 2[2]Landes W M,Pesner R A.The Economic Structure of Tort Law[M].Harvard University Press,1987:58 -60.
  • 3[3]Newman J O.Rething Fainess:Perspectives on the Litigation Process[J].Yale Law Journal,1985,(7):1643-1650
  • 4[4]Sidney M J.Some Psychological Aspects of Privacy[J].Law & Contemperay Problems 1966,(31):307.
  • 5[5]程春华.民事证据法初论[M].厦门:厦门大学出版社,2001.
  • 6[6]Jack Hirshleifer.The Private and Social Value of Information and the Reward to Inventive Activity[J].American Economic Review,1971,(61):561.
  • 7[美]罗宾·保罗·麦乐怡 孙潮译.法与经济学[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社,1999..
  • 8[9][日]中野贞一郎,松蒲馨,铃木正裕.民事诉讼法讲义[M].东京:有斐阁,1987:36.
  • 9[美]诺思.西方世界的兴起[M].厉以平译.北京:华夏出版社,1999.
  • 10田平安,刘春梅.试论协同型民事诉讼模式的建立[J].现代法学,2003,25(1):83-88. 被引量:116

二级参考文献13

共引文献186

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部