期刊文献+

一种转型理论 被引量:1

原文传递
导出
摘要 在这篇短评中,我将对孙立平富有启发性的文章,“社会转型:发展社会学的新议题”,做些补充而不是批评。我对孙的文章大都同意,我不想详细讨论我们之间多数是在术语使用上的分歧,而想强调我们在分析上的共同点。
出处 《开放时代》 CSSCI 2008年第2期102-108,共7页 Open Times
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1BRUGGER, WILLIAM (1976) Democracy and Organization in the Chinese Industrial Enterprise (1948-1953). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 2BURAWOY, MICHAEL (1996) “The state and economic involution: Russia through the Chinese lens.” World Development 24, 6: 16-38.
  • 3BURAWOY, MICHAEL( 2001 a) “Transition without transformation : Russia's involutionary road to capitalism.” East European Politics and Society 15, 2: 269-92.
  • 4BURAWOY, MICHAEL(2001b) “Neo-classical sociology.” American J.of Sociology 106, 4: 1099-1120.
  • 5BURAWOY, MICHAEL and PAVEL KROTOV (1992) “The Soviet transition from socialism to capitalism: worker control and economic bargaining.” American Sociological R. 57, 1: 16-38.
  • 6COATES, DAVID (2000) Modes of Capitalism. London:Polity Press.
  • 7EISENSTADT, SHMUEL (1991) “Some observation on the relationship between Confucianism, development and modernization.” Pp. 360-66 in Silke Krieger and Rolf Trauzettel (eds.), Confucianism and the Modernization of China. Mains: v. Hase and Koehler Verlag.
  • 8ESPING-ANDERSEN, GOSTA (1990) Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press. EYAL, GIL, IVAN SZELENYI, and ELEANOR TOWNSLEY (1998) Making Capitalism without Capitalists. London : Verso.
  • 9ESPING-ANDERSEN, GOSTA(2001) “The utopia of post-socialist theory and the ironic view of history of neo-classical sociology.” American J. of Sociology 106, 4:1121-28.
  • 10ESPING-ANDERSEN, GOSTA(2003) “On irony: an invitation to neo-classical sociology.”Thesis Eleven 73: 5-41.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部