期刊文献+

惩罚性赔偿在我国的适用和完善 被引量:1

The application and perfection of punitive damages in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 惩罚性赔偿制度的产生和发展没有否认传统的补偿性赔偿制度的合理性,只是作为一般损害赔偿制度之外一种例外而存在的赔偿制度。文章首先阐述了惩罚性赔偿的概念、产生及其在英美法上的历史发展;其次借助对惩罚性赔偿的法理基础和基本功能的分析,论证了该制度存在的合理性;最后通过对我国惩罚性赔偿制度的立法和适用现状的剖析,并与国外的惩罚性赔偿制度的比较,在惩罚性赔偿的适用范围、构成要件、惩罚性赔偿数额的确定等方面对该项制度提出了完善的建议。 Punitive damages system hasn't disaffirmed the rationality of traditional complementary damages system when it came into being and developed. It only makes an exception on the general damages system. This article firstly expounds on the conception, appearance and historical development in Anglo-American law system; secondly by dint of the analysis on the nomological foundation and basic function of punitive damages, it demonstrates the rationality of punitive damages; by a natomy on legislation and applicable actuality in China.and compared with overseas punitive damages system, finally this article tables a proposal on applicable areas, component elements and computation of punitive damages.
作者 陈寒冰
出处 《周口师范学院学报》 CAS 2008年第1期84-87,共4页 Journal of Zhoukou Normal University
关键词 惩罚性赔偿 补偿性赔偿 侵权责任 威慑 效率 构成要件 punitive damages complementary damages tortuous liability determent efficiency component elements
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1王利明.惩罚性赔偿研究[J].中国社会科学,2000(4):112-122. 被引量:855
  • 2王利明.美国惩罚性赔偿制度研究[M]//民商法研究:第6辑.北京:法律出版社,2004:633-634.
  • 3王立峰.论惩罚性赔偿[M]//梁慧星.民商法论丛:第15卷.北京:法律出版社,2000:60.
  • 4梁慧星.消费者权茸保护法第49条的解释与适用[N].人民法院报,2002-03-29(3).

二级参考文献40

  • 1Note, "Exemplary Damages in the Law of Torts", 70 Harv. L. Rev. 517, 517 (1957), and Huckle v.Money, 95 Eng. Rep. 768 (K. B. 1763).
  • 2Malzof V. United Statea, I 12 S. Ct. 711, 715 (1992).
  • 3Ernet C. Stiefel: "U. S. Punitive Damage Awards in Germany" , 39 The American Journal of Comparative Law, 1991, p. 784.
  • 4TimothyJ. Phillips ,"The Punitive Dawage Class Action: A Solution to the problem of Multiple punishment" ,1984 U. Ill. L. Rev. 153.
  • 5David R. Levy, Note, "Punitive Damages in Light of TXO Productions Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp",39 St. Louis U, L. J. 409, 412 n. 20 (1994).
  • 6Ausness, Retribution and Deterrence : The Role of Punitive Damages in Products Liability Litation , 74 K y.L. J. 1,2 (1985).
  • 7Coryell v. Colbaugh, 1 N. J. L. 90, 91 (Sup. Ct. 1791).
  • 8Wils. K. B. 20.5, 9.5 Eng, Rep. 768 (C. P. 1763).
  • 9Genayv. Norris, IS. C. L. 3, 1 Bay 6 (1784).
  • 10David Owen, "Punative Damage in Products Liability Litigation", 74 Mich. L. Rev. 1257 (1976).

共引文献854

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部