期刊文献+

特征概率影响多维和少维类别的分类学习和特征学习 被引量:1

The Influence of Probabilities of Features on the Classification Learning and Feature Learning of High-Dimension Categories and Low-Dimension Ones
下载PDF
导出
摘要 探讨了特征概率对多维和少维类别的分类学习和特征学习的效果及策略的影响。结果表明高特征概率条件下,多维比少维类别的分类学习更容易,而且学到更多的特征知识,多维条件下人们更倾向于整体性加工策略,而少维条件下人们倾向于分析性加工策略。低特征概率条件下,多维比少维类别的分类学习和特征学习都困难,且两种条件下人们都倾向于采取分析性加工策略。 Researchers often use artificial categories instead of natural ones in psychology experiments in order to avoid familiarity, but these two kinds of categories are different in many ways, especially in category dimensionality. Natural categories have a lot of dimensions, but the artificial ones often have fewer dimensions. Since category materials influence how people learn categories and their representations, it is important to investigate how category dimensionality affects classification learning and feature learning. Hoffman and Murphy (2006) investigated this issue and found people learned high-dimension category no more slowly than low-dimension ones and learned more feature knowledge, which was surprising and contrary to what current category theories predicted. We analyzed the materials they used in their experiments and found that the probabilities of the features were high and different features could be integrated to generate holistic perceptions, which might be the reason behind the results. We thought probabilities of features played an important role in classification learning and feature learning of high-dimension categories. Our hypothesis was that classification learning and feature learning of high-dimension categories would not be advanced if probabilities of features were low and dimensions were poorly integrated. We explored how category dimensionality and probabilities of features affect category learning. 80 college students participated in the experiment voluntarily and we analyzed the data using SPSS 11. 0. The resuits showed that if the probabilities of features were high, the classification learning and feature learning of high-dimension category were better than those of the low-dimension one. However, if the probabilities of features were low, the classification learning and feature learning of low-dimension category were better than those of the high-dimension one. From this study we can draw the conclusion that probabilities of features and relations between dimensions play an important role in category learning, which is often ignored in current category theories, and that people tend to grasp the whole mode and holistic perception in high-dimension classification learning and feature learning.
出处 《应用心理学》 CSSCI 2007年第3期195-203,共9页 Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology
关键词 类别维度个数 特征概率 分类学习 特征学习 category dimensionality, probabilities of features, classification learning, feature learning
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Ashby F G, Maddox W T. Human category learning. Annual Review of Psychology,2005,56:149 - 178.
  • 2Heit E. Models of the effects of prior knowledge on category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Larning, Memory, and Cognition, 1994,20 : 1264 - 1282.
  • 3Maddox W T. Base-rate effects in multidimensional perceptual categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory and Cognition, 1995, 21:288 -301.
  • 4Nosofsky R M, Stanton R D. Speeded classification in a probabilistic category structure : Contrasting exemplar-retrieval, decision-boundary, ancl prototype models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2005, 31 (3) :608 -629.
  • 5Shepard R N, Hovland C I, Jenkins H M. Learning and memorization of classifications. Psychological Monographys : General and Applied, 1961,75:13 -51.
  • 6Love B C. Comparing supervised and unsupervised category learning. Psychonomlc Bulletin & Review, 2002, 9 (4) :829-835.
  • 7Rehder B, Hoffman A B. Thirty-something categorization results explained: Selective attention, eyetracking, and models of category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory, ancl Cognition, 2005 b, 31 : 811-829.
  • 8Love B C. The muhifaeeted nature of unsupervised category learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2003, 10(1) :190-197.
  • 9Rouder J N, Rateliff R. Comparing Categorization Models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2004, 133 ( 1 ) : 63 - 82.
  • 10Nosofsky R M, Palmeri T J, McKinley S C. Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning. Psychological Review, 1994,101:53 - 79.

二级参考文献27

  • 1Anderson J R. The adaptive nature of btlman categorization. Psychological Review, 1991,98(2) : 409 -429.
  • 2Bruner J S, C, oodnow J, Austin G A. A study of thinking. New York: Wiley, 1956.
  • 3Bosch E H. Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1975, 104:192-233.
  • 4Medin D L, Smith E E. Concepts and concept formation. Annual Review of Psychology, 1984, 35 : 113 - 138.
  • 5Medin D L, Goldstone R L, Gentne D. Similarity involving attributes and relations: Judgments of similarity and difference and not inverses. Psychological Science, 1990, 1 : 64 - 69.
  • 6Komatsu L K. Recent biew of conceptual structure . Psychological Bulletin,1992,112:500 -502.
  • 7Goldstone R L. The role of similarity in categorization: Providing a groundwork. Co-ition, 1994,52:125 - 157.
  • 8Medin D L. Concepts and conceptual structure. American Psychologist, 1989,44:1469-1481.
  • 9Medin D L, Goldstone R L, Gentner D. Respects for similarity Psychological Review, 1993,100 : 254 - 278.
  • 10Markman A B, Wisniewski E J. Similar and different: The differentiation of basic level categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory & Cognition, 1997,23 : 54 -70.

共引文献24

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部