期刊文献+

兔眼滤过性手术中植入硅凝胶膜的实验研究(英文) 被引量:1

Experimental study of silicone membrane implanted beneath the scleral flap during filtering surgery in rabbits
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:在兔眼行硅凝胶膜植入后,通过观察眼内压、滤过泡、病理组织检查结果评价硅凝胶膜植入的安全性和有效性。方法:共40只兔随机分为4组,每组10只。每只兔一眼行巩膜瓣下小梁咬切术,术中植入硅凝胶膜,对侧眼单纯行巩膜瓣下小梁咬切术作为对照。术后观察眼内压、滤过泡的变化,并且每只眼行组织病理学检查。结果:植入眼较对照眼低眼压和滤过泡维持时间长,光镜显示植入眼滤过道、咬切口区保持通畅。成纤维细胞增殖的活性与规律,在植入眼和对照眼是相似的。硅凝胶膜不会刺激成纤维细胞增殖的过度表达。结论:硅凝胶膜植入术作为一种新型引流术具有安全、有效、操作简单的优点。 AIM: To investigate the efficacy and security of the silicone membrane implant through observing intraocular pressure, filtering blebs and histopathologic results. METHODS:Forty rabbits were randomly divided into 4 groups. Each group consisted of 10 rabbits. Trabeculectomy and silicone membrane implantation were performed in one eye of each rabbit, while the other eye was only performed trabeculectomy as control. The change of intraocular pressure, filtering blebs were observed postoperatively. And each eye had undergone histopathologic examination. RESULTS:The duration of low intraocular pressure and existence of filtering blebs in implanted eyes was longer than that in controlled eyes. Light microscopy revealed that patent drainage tract and biting site could be seen in silicone membrane implanted eye. The activity and regularity of fibroblast proliferation in implanted eyes and controlled eyes were similar. Excessive expression of fibroblast proliferation was not induced by silicone membrane. CONCLUSION: Characterized by safety, effectiveness and simplicity, silicone membrane implantation can act as a new drainage surgery.
出处 《国际眼科杂志》 CAS 2008年第3期445-447,共3页 International Eye Science
关键词 硅凝胶膜 引流术 眼内压 silicone membrane drainage surgery intraocular pressure
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献63

  • 1孟娜,任百超.青光眼房水引流装置的研究进展[J].国际眼科杂志,2005,5(4):715-718. 被引量:31
  • 2杨侠,董晓光.Ahmed青光眼阀治疗难治性青光眼的作用和现状[J].国际眼科杂志,2005,5(5):994-998. 被引量:34
  • 3Dahan E,Carmichael TR.Iuplantation of a Miniature Glaucoma Device Under a Scleral Flap.J Glauccoma ,2005;14(2):98-102.
  • 4Minckler D.Advances with Aqueous Shunts 1990 to 2001.J Glaucoma,2001;10(5):85-87.
  • 5Choi YJ,Kim CS,Ahn BH.A comparison of the clinicaleffect between e-PTFE membrane-tube implant and Ahmed glaucoua valve implant for the treatment of refactory glaucoma Koean J Ophthalmol,2003;1 7(2):106-113.
  • 6Sheng,Lim K.Corneal Endothelial Cell Damage from Glaucoma Drainage Device Materials.Cornea,2003;22(4):352-354.
  • 7Wilson MR,Mendis U,Paliwal A,Haynatzka V.Long-term follow-up of primary glaucoma surgery with Ahmed glaucoma valve implant versus trabeculectomy.Am J Ophthalmol,2003;136(3):464-470.
  • 8Wilson MR,Mendis UP,Smith SD,Paliwal A.Ahmed Glaucoma Vavle Implant vs Trabe-culectomy in the Surgical treatment of Glaucoma:A randomized clinical trial.Am J Ophthalmol ,2000;130:267-273.
  • 9Colemau AL,Hill R,Wilson MR,Choplin N.Initial clinical Experience With Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Inplant.Am.J Ophthalmol,1995;120:23-31.
  • 10Melamed S.MoIeno implant surgery in refractory glaucoma.Surv Ophthalmol,1990;34:441-448.

共引文献44

同被引文献24

  • 1Azuara-Blanco A, Katz L J, Dysfunctional filtering blebs: Major review [J]. Surv Ophthalmol, 1998, 43 (2) : 93-126.
  • 2Minckler DS, Francis BA, Hodapp EA, et al. Aqueous shunts in glaucoma: A report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology [ J ]. Ophthalmology, 2008, 115 (6) : 1089- 1098.
  • 3Occleston NL, Daniels, Tarnuzzer RW, et al. Single expo- sures to antiproliferatives: Long-term effects on ocular fi- broblast and healing behavior [ J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1997, 38(10) : 1998-2007.
  • 4Skuta RL, Parrish RK. Wound healing in glaucoma filtering surgery [J]. Surv Ophthalmol, 1987, 32(3) : 149-170.
  • 5Tome KE, Traverso CE. The glaucoma in aphakia and pseudophaki&Surv [ J ]. Ophthalmology, 199], 36: 79-88.
  • 6Molteno AC. New implant for draining in glaucoma. Animal trial [J]. BrJ Ophthalmol, 1969, 53(1): 161-168.
  • 7Yu DY, Alder VA, Cringle SJ, Su EN et aL Vasoactivity of intraluminal and extraluminal agonists in perfused retinal ar- teries [J] Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1994, 35 (12): 4087- 4099.
  • 8Wilson MR, Mendis U, Smith SD, et al. Ahmed glaucoma valve implant vs trabeculectomy in the surgical treatment of glaucoma: A randomized clinical trial[J]. Am J Ophthal- mol, 2000, 130(3) : 26?-273.
  • 9Hong CH, Arosemena A, Zurakowski D, et aL Glaucoma drainage devices: A systematic literature review and cur- rent controversies [J]. Surv Ophthalmol, 2005, 50 ( l ) : 48 -60.
  • 10Ayyala RS, Harman LE, Michelini-Norris B, et aL Com- parison of different biomaterials for glaucoma drainage de- vices [ J ]. Arch Ophthalmol, 1999, 117 (2) : 233-236.

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部