期刊文献+

用放射吸收法(RA)测量指骨骨密度精确度和准确性的研究 被引量:10

Radiographic absorgtiometry for bone mineral measurement of the phalanges precision and accuracy study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价放射吸收法(RA)测量2、3、4指骨中节骨密度的精确度和准确性。方法对19例尸体的双手,用铝制楔型标志物,分别进行了50kV 400mA和60kV 300mA两次X线照射,对每只手指的第二至第四节指骨的骨矿含量(BMC)和骨密度(BMD),以AU(指骨指数)为单位进行测量和分析。结果对于BMC-AU来说,这种方法的精密度误差是1.0%,对于BMD-AU来说,精密度误差是0.6%。通过5mm和6mm酒精厚度所获得的X射线图可以观察到BMD-AU有2.0%到2.4%的降低,与对照组相比有明显的统计学差异(P<0.01)。采用X射线吸收测定法得到的BMC-AU和前臂的BMC有良好的相关性(r=0.887),并且在指骨的BMC-AU与骨灰重量之间也有较好的相关性(r=0.983)。结论放射吸收法(RA)测量外周骨骨密度具有较高的精确度和准确性。 Objective To evaluate the accuracy and precision of a radiographic absorptiometry(RA) method for assessment of bone mineral of the middle phalanges. Methods Nineteen cadaveric hands were radiographed with an aluminum wedge, once at 50KVP and 400MA and once at 60KVP and 300MA. Bone mineral content(BMC) and bone mineral density(NMD) of the second to fourth middle phalanges, expressed in arbitrary units( BMC-AU and BMD-AU) ,were analyzed and averaged in each hand.Results The precision error of this method was 1.0% for BMC-AU and 0.6% for BND-AU. A 2.0% - 2.4% reduction in BMD-AU seen on radiographs obtained through ethanol thicknesses of 5 and 6 mm compared with that seen on controls was statistically significant ( P 〈 0.01 ).The correlation between BMC-AU and forearm BMC determined with dual x-ray abserptiometry was good( r = 0. 887 ), and that between BMC-AU and ash weight in the phalanges was excellent (r = 0. 983 ). Conclusions The RA method is precise and accurate for bone mineral assessment of the peripherai appendicular skeleton.
出处 《中国骨质疏松杂志》 CAS CSCD 2008年第3期208-211,共4页 Chinese Journal of Osteoporosis
关键词 骨骼 吸收测定法 手指和足趾 Bones Absorptimetry Fingersandtoes Hand
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Colbert C, Banhtell RS. Raddiongraphic absorptiometry. In : CohnSH, ed. Noninvasive measurements of bone mass and their clinical application. Boca Raton, Fia : CRC, 1981,52-84.
  • 2Cosman F, Herrington B, Himmelstein S, et al. Radiongaphic absorptiometry: a simple method for determination of bone mass. Osteoporosis Int, 1991,2 : 34-38.
  • 3Hayashi Y, Yamamoto K, Fukunaga M, et al. Assessment of bone mass by image analysis of metacrpai bone roentenograms: a quantitative digital image processing (DIP) method. Radiat Med, 1990,8:173-178.
  • 4Trouerbach WT, Birkenhager JC, Collette HJA, et al. Astudy on the phalanx bone mineral content in 273 normal per-nd postmenopausal females( a transversal study of age-dependent bone loss). Bone Miner, 1987,3:53-62.
  • 5Albanese AA, Edelson AH, Lorenze El, et al. Quantitative radiography survey techniqur for detection of bone loss. J Am Gefiatr Sco, 1969,17 : 142-154.
  • 6Horsman A, Simpson M. Measurement of sequential changes incortical bone geometry. Br J Radiol, 1975,48:471-476.
  • 7Rosenthal DI, Gregg GA, Slovik DM, et al. A ccomparison of quantitative computed tomography to four techniques of uqqer extremity bone mass measurement. In : Genant HK, ed. Osteoponrosis update 1987. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press, 1987 ; 87- 93.
  • 8Cameron JR, Sorensen J. Measurement of bone mineral in vivo : an improved method. Science, 1963,142:230-232.
  • 9Larcos G, Wahner HW. AN evaluation of foream bone mineral measurement with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. J Nucl MED, 1991,32:2101-2106.
  • 10Weinstein RS, Nwe KD, Sappington LJ. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry versus single phonton absorptiometry of the radius. Calcif Tissue Int, 1991,49 : 313-316.

同被引文献73

引证文献10

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部