期刊文献+

逻辑是可修正的吗? 被引量:7

Can Logic be Revisable?
原文传递
导出
摘要 Seriously,revisability of logic is referred to logical systems,but not the logic itself.If logic can be referred to formal structure of argument,if we regard logic as objects of study,if revisability of logic is referred to logical validity,we should believe that logic is not revisable.If we regard logic as some study,this logical systems may contains mistakes and then is revisable.If revisability of logic is referred to logical systems,in the sense of replacement,we can think that the logical systems can be revisable.The diversify of logical systems,the emergence of new logical theories is a development tendency of modern logic. Seriously,revisability of logic is referred to logical systems,but not the logic itself.If logic can be referred to formal structure of argument,if we regard logic as objects of study,if revisability of logic is referred to logical validity,we should believe that logic is not revisable.If we regard logic as some study,this logical systems may contains mistakes and then is revisable.If revisability of logic is referred to logical systems,in the sense of replacement,we can think that the logical systems can be revisable.The diversify of logical systems,the emergence of new logical theories is a development tendency of modern logic.
机构地区 南开大学哲学系
出处 《哲学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第3期116-120,共5页 Philosophical Research
基金 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“现代归纳逻辑的创新功能与应用及其认知基础研究”(编号05JZD0008)序列成果之一
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1王路.逻辑真理是可错的吗?[J].哲学研究,2007(10):108-116. 被引量:20
  • 2周礼全.形式逻辑和自然语言[J].哲学研究,1993(12):29-35. 被引量:16
  • 3Frege, Gottlob, 1997, "The thought", translated by Peter Geach and R. H. Stoothoff, in Michael Beaney( ed. ) , The Frege Reader, Oxford: Blackwell.
  • 4Haack, Susan, 1978, Philosophy of Logic, Cambridge University Press.
  • 51996, Deviant Logic and Fuzzy Logic:Beyond the Formalism, The University of Chicago Press.
  • 6Waal, Cornelis de (ed.), 2007, Susan Haack :A Lady of Distinctions The Philosoper Responds to Her Critics, Prometheus Books.
  • 7Zadenh, Lotfi, 1975 ,"Fuzzy logic and approximate reasoning", in Sythese 30.

二级参考文献10

  • 1陈波.一个与归纳问题类似的演绎问题——演绎的证成[J].中国社会科学,2005(2):84-95. 被引量:18
  • 21998年.《奎因哲学研究》.三联书店.
  • 32000年.《逻辑哲学导论》.中国人民大学出版社.
  • 4达米特.2004年.《形而上学的逻辑基础》.任晓明,李国山译.中国人民大学出版社.
  • 5弗雷格.2006年.《论涵义和意谓》.《弗雷格哲学逻辑论著选辑》.王路译,王炳文校.商务印书馆.
  • 6奎因.1987年.《经验论的两个教条》.《从逻辑的观点看》.上海译文出版社.
  • 72005年.《亚里士多德的逻辑学说》.中国社会科学出版社.
  • 8Haack,Susan, 1996, “Dummett' s justification of deduction”, in Susan Haack, Deviant Logic, Fuzzy Logic, London: The University of Chicago Press, Ltd..
  • 9Quine, W.V. ,1970,Philosophy of Logic, Prentice-Hall, Inc..
  • 101994, “Two dogmas of empiricism”, in From a Logical Point of View, Harvard University Press.

共引文献34

同被引文献38

引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部