明代全刻本《韩非子》流传考述

A Historical Study of the Complete Version of Hanfeizi Published in the Ming Dynasty

明代全刻本《韩非子》由于其篇幅之全值得研究者重视。但是,由于有些版本已经较难见到,所以现在的《韩非子》校注者往往都没有认真地利用它们去进行校勘,以致产生了不少错误的认识。如陈奇猷将"赵用贤本"与"管韩合刻本"视为两种版本,说"管韩合刻本""出于赵本"。陈启天、陈奇猷将周孔教本与黄策本当作两种版本。同时,他们所附录的序跋题识,也存在着很多错误。如陈启天《增订韩非子校释》与陈奇猷《韩非子新校注》的附录,将赵用贤《〈韩非子〉书序》之"余以为彼其尽绌圣贤之旨"误为"余以为彼其尽纳圣贤之旨",将王世贞《合刻〈管子〉〈韩非子〉序》之"读之使人不胜乙"误为"读之使人不胜也"、"读之使人不能胜也"。为了避免以讹传讹,我们有必要将第一手资料公之于世。本文详细考述明代《韩非子》之全刻本(赵用贤本、周孔教本、吴勉学本、凌瀛初本、沈景麟本、赵如源本、葛鼎本等),附录了其中具有重要学术价值的序文,以及卢文?、顾广圻、王渭等校雠名家的题识,以供学者研究时参考。

The complete version of Hanfeizi in different editions published in the Ming Dynasty deserves careful studies.However,because some editions are not easily available,today's proofreaders and annotators of Hanfeizi often avoid taking pains to proofread or annotate them.As a result,there appear numerous errors in the later editions.This paper gives a careful textual analysis of the complete version of Hanfeizi in different editions published in the Ming Dynasty and provides the valuable forwards to these editions and some famous scholars' explanatory notes,which should be of great value to its further studies.