期刊文献+

3种新型复合树脂材料耐磨性及硬度的体外研究 被引量:25

An in vitro investigation of wear resistance and hardness of three kinds of new composite resins
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价3种新型复合树脂材料的耐磨性及硬度。方法选取Solidex、Spectrum、FiltekTM Z350新型复合树脂材料为研究对象,对照组为釉质。在改装的MG-200型摩擦磨损实验机上进行磨损实验。扫描电镜观察摩擦表面形貌。用维氏硬度仪测量4种样本的维氏硬度。用秩和检验和单因素方差分析对磨损量和硬度值进行统计分析。通过直线回归分析的方法来分析3种复合树脂磨损量与硬度的相关性。结果3种复合树脂材料中,FiltekTM Z350显示了最低的磨损量和最高的维氏硬度(P<0.05)。Solidex与Spectrum的磨损量和硬度无显著性差异(P>0.05)。3种复合树脂材料的磨损量与硬度间存在显著的相关性(r=-0.9686)(P<0.05)。扫描电镜下各材料的摩擦表面形貌显示了不同的磨损特征。结论纳米填料复合树脂的耐磨性及硬度优于混合填料复合树脂。 Objective To evaluate wear resistance and hardness of three kinds of new composite resins. Methods Three kinds of new composite resins, Solidex, Spectrum, Filtek^TM Z350, were tested. Enamel as control group. A refited MG-200 wear machine was used in this study. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to observe the friction surface of each tested material. Hardness of each tested material was determined by Vickers indentation technique. The data of wear and hardness were analyzed by Mann-Whitney test and 1-way ANOVA. The relationship between the hardness of the composites and the amount of wear of them was determined by a regression analysis method. Results Filtek^TM Z350 showed the lowest volumetric wear and highest Vickers hardness in the composites (P〈0.05). No significant differences in wear and hardness were observed between Solidex and Spectrum (P〉0.05). Significant relationships were observed between the hardness of the composites and the amount of wear of them (r=-0.968 6)(P〈0.05). Different wear characters of the friction surface of the tested materials were observed by SEM. Conclusion Nanofilled composite was superior to the hybrid composite in wear resistance and hardness.
出处 《华西口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第1期15-18,共4页 West China Journal of Stomatology
基金 江西省卫生厅基金资助项目(2003)
关键词 复合树脂 填料 耐磨性 硬度 composite resin filler wear resistance hardness
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1ISO TR1021. Dentistry-determination of tarnish and corrosion of mentals and aUoys[S]. Switzerland, 1993:3.
  • 2陈治清.口腔材料学[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:42.
  • 3Harrison A, Lewis TT. The development of an abrasion testing machine for dental materials[J]. J Biomed Mater Res, 1975, 9(3): 341-353.
  • 4Knobloch LA, Kerby RE, Seghi R, et al. Two-body wear resistance and degcee of conversion of laboratory-processed composite materials[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 1999, 12(5):432-438.
  • 5张怀勤,巢永烈.复合树脂的研究进展[J].国外医学(口腔医学分册),2005,32(1):23-24. 被引量:10
  • 6Kawai K, Iwami Y, Ebisu S. Effect of resin monomer composition on toothbrush wear resistance[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 1998, 25 (4) : 264-268.
  • 7Say EC, Civelek A, Nobeeourt A, et al. Wear and mierohardness of different resin composite materials[J]. Oper Dent, 2003, 28 (5) : 628-634.
  • 8Yap AU, Chew CL, Ong LF, et al. Environmental damage and oeelusal contact area wear of composite restoratives[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2002, 29(1): 87-97.
  • 9Suzuki S, Nagai E, Taira Y, et al. In vitro wear of indirect composite restoratives[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2002, 88(4):431-436.

二级参考文献16

  • 1Peutzfeldt A.Eur J Oral Sci, 1997, 105 (2),97-116.
  • 2Mielieh F, Jeang L, Eiek JD, et al. J Dent Res, 1998,77 (4) :603-608.
  • 3Eiek JD, Byerley TJ, Chapell BP, et al. Dent Mater,1993, 9 (12) : 123-127.
  • 4Xu HH, Smith Dr, Schumacher GE, et al. J Biomed Mater Res, 2000, 52(4):812-818.
  • 5Xu HH, Quinn JB, Smith DT, et al. Biomaterials, 2002, 23 (3) :735-742.
  • 6Clum DCN, Titus HW, Chung KH, et al. Dent Mater, 1999, 15(3) :219-222.
  • 7Poweli GL, Blanenau BJ. Dent Clin North Am, 2000, 44 (4) :923-930.
  • 8Rueggeberg FA. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 1999, 20 (Supp) : S4-15.
  • 9Bouschlicher MR, Rueggeberg FA, Boyer DB. J Esther Dent, 2000, 12(1) :23-32.
  • 10Mills RW, Jandt KD, Ashworth SH. Br Dent J, 1999,186 (8) : 388-391.

共引文献14

同被引文献223

引证文献25

二级引证文献130

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部