台湾“公投”的法理学辨析被引量：3

Jurisprudential Analysis of Taiwan "Plebiscite"

导出

摘要台湾当局选务机关决定于2008年3月22日举行民进党提出的"入联公投",并决定同时举行国民党提出的"返联公投"。"公投"问题不仅成为台湾岛内政治斗争的焦点,而且成为海峡两岸及中美双方高度关切的问题。台湾"公投"依据的原理虽然是民族自决原则,但由于台湾本身不符合民族自决的主体资格,因此其实施的"公投"不具有法律效力,是对国际法真实含义的歪曲,其实质是试图通过"公投"来实现"独立建国"的设想。 Taiwan authority decided to hold Taiwan＇s UN Plebiscite which proposed by the Democratic Progressive Party as well as Taiwan＇s Plebiscite for returning to UN proposed by Kuomintang on March 22. Taiwan＇s plebiscite has not only become the focus of political struggle in Taiwan, but also a high degree of concern of the cross-strait relations and Sino-US relations. The research in the article finds that since Taiwan itself does not apply to the main body qualification of the people＇s self-determination, Taiwan＇s plebiscite system does not have the force of law although it refers to the People＇s self-determination. The essence of Taiwan＇s plebiscite is trying to achieve ＂Independence＂ under the name of self-determination and it is actually trying to wantonly trample and distort the real meaning of the international law.

作者廉思孙国华

机构地区北京大学国际关系学院中国人民大学法学院

出处《中国人民大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第2期114-121,共8页 Journal of Renmin University of China

关键词公民投票民族自决主体资格 plebiscite people＇s self-determination main body qualification

分类号 D921 [政治法律—宪法学与行政法学] D675.8 [政治法律—中外政治制度]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献19

1Markku Suksi. Bringing in the People: A Comparison of Constitutional Forms and Practices of the Referendum. Boston; Martinus Nijhoft, 1993.
2David Butler and Austin Ranney (eds.). Referendums around the world: The Growing Use of Direct Democracy Washington, D. C.: American Enterprise Institute Press,1994.
3John Howard Clinebell & Jim Thomson. Sovereignty and Self-determination : The Right of Native Americans unders International Law, Buffalo Law Review, Vol. 27, 1978.
4S. J. Anaya. Self-Determination as a Collective Human Right under Contemporary International Law, in P. Aikio & M. Scheinin eds. , Operationalizing the Right of Indigenous Peoples to Self-Determination, Abo Akademi University, 2000.
5Oppenheim-Lanterpacht. International Law, London Publishing, Vol. Ⅰ, 7^th, 1955.
6Charles. Rousseau. Droit international public, 2, Paris: Sirey, 1974.
7H. Jellinek. Der automatische Erwerb und Verlust der Staatsangehoerigkeit durch voelkerrechtliche Vorgaenge, zugleich ein Beitrag zur Lehre von der Staatensukzession, Heymanns Publishing, 1951.
8R. Bindschedler. "Annexion", Strupp-Schlochauer, Woerterbuch des Voelkerrecht, 3 Vols. , 1960-1962, Vol. Ⅰ.
9Ch. G. Fenwick. International Law, 4th ed. , Longman Publishing Group, 1965. .
10G. Starushenko. The Principle of National Self-Determination in Soviet Foreign Policy, Foreign Languages Publishing, Moscow, 1964.