自然辩证法只能发展不容消解——评自然辩证法与历史辩证法的对立

Dialectics of Nature:To Be Developed and Never Dispelled——Refutes Opposition of the Dialectics of Nature and Dialectics of history

对自然辩证法的消解自卢卡奇肇始已近一个世纪,这种论调在国内哲学界同样有着较大的"市场"。他们的观点是,恩格斯的自然证法是从脱离人的自然界出发,因而是无视人的;马克思自然观的出发点是被人的目的性活动中介过的"人化的自然界";马克思从不赞成"自然辩证法",马克思的辩证法是历史辩证法,与恩格斯的自然辩证法是对立的。对此,重返文本与勘查马克思主义发展史,可以清楚地认定,在承认自在自然的辩证法基础上,恩格斯理解辩证法绝非"无人的视野",马克思一直支持与赞同恩格斯的自然辩证法的研究。恩格斯与马克思正是面对着不同任务,来共同研究一部"完整"的辩证法即在实践的基础上自然辩证法与历史辩证法的辩证统一的辩证法。

Starts from Lucars, dispelling dialectics of nature already has one century. Mast of the domestic philosophy community endorsed this viewpoint. They thought that Engels＇ s dialectics of nature disregards the human, but Marx＇ s view is embarks from ＂the humanization nature＂. Marx insists on the dialectics of history. On the contrary, Engels insists on the dialectics of nature. By Reading the history of Marxism, we thought that Marx approves of the natural dialectical method, and that Engels ＇ s dialectical method has not neglected the human. They have studied together in a complete dialectical method on the basis of practical foundation.