期刊文献+

认知与功能双维观照下的范畴化 被引量:2

Categorization from Perspectives of Cognitive and Functional Linguistics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 认知语言学为范畴化研究做出了很大贡献,但并未回答范畴化能力动态发展的外在语言表现如何、有限的语言如何被调用以表述多样的经验现象等问题。系统功能语言学从自身理论,比如语法作为经验的编码、概念库、精密度阶等角度出发,对范畴化做了系统研究。其解释虽与认知范畴化研究不乏融通之处,但更多地凸现了自己的独特,可以视为对认知范畴化研究的重要贡献和补充。 Despite great contributions to categorization studies, Cognitive Linguistics fails to solve several problems: the externalized language performance of the dynamic development of categorization ability, how limited language resource is maneuvered to represent diverse phenomena etc. SFL approaches categorization from a distinctive way from Cognitive Linguistics, such as grammar as construal of experience, the ideation base, scale of delicacy, thus establishing its own model of construing experience through meaning. Although this SFL model shares much commensuration and compatibility with cognitive categorization studies, it offers a peculiar explanation to categorization. Thus, it can be regarded as an important contribution and complement to cognitive categorization research.
作者 陈海叶
出处 《四川外语学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第1期61-65,共5页 Journal of Sichuan International Studies University
关键词 范畴化 经验识解 系统功能语言学 精密度阶 概念库 categorization experiential construal SFL scale of delicacy the ideation base
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Ungerer.F.& H.J.Schmid.Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社.2001.
  • 2Lakoff, G. Women , Fire and Dangerous Things: What Cat- egories Reveal about the Mind [ M ] . Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1957.
  • 3吴世雄,陈维振.范畴理论的发展及其对认知语言学的贡献[J].外国语,2004,27(4):34-40. 被引量:94
  • 4Berlin, Brent and Paul Kay. Basic Color Terms. Their Universality and Evolution, Berkeley[ M ]. Los Angeles : University of California Press, 1969.
  • 5Rosch, E. & C.B. Mervis. Family Resemblances: Studies in the Internal Structure of Categories [ J ]. Cognitive Psychology,1975, (7) :573 -605.
  • 6Rosch, E. Principles of Categorization [ C ]//E. Rosch & B. Lloyd. Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum, 1978.27 - 28.
  • 7Labov, William. The Boundary of Words and their Meaning [C]//Charles-James N. Bailey and Roger W. Shuy. New ways of analyzing variation in English. Washington D. C. : Georgetown University Press, 1973:340 - 373.
  • 8Halliday, M. A.K. Matthiessen, C. M. I.M. Construing Experience through Meaning: A Language-Based Approach to Cognition[ M ]. Cassell, London & New York, 1999.
  • 9Halliday, M. A. K. Learning How to Mean[M]. London: Edward Arnold, 1975.
  • 10Painter, C. The Development of Language as a Resource for Thinking: a Linguistic View of Learning [C]// R. Hasan & G. Williams. Literacy in Society London and New York: Longman, 1996.

二级参考文献27

  • 1沈家煊.语法研究的分析和综合[J].外语教学与研究,1999,31(2):1-7. 被引量:75
  • 2俞如珍.简论词的模糊性、概括性和特指性[J].外国语,1993,16(2):58-60. 被引量:23
  • 3崔延强.关于亚里士多德所理解的“范畴”一词考释[J].江淮论坛,1993(1):26-28. 被引量:4
  • 4吴世雄,陈维振.论语义范畴的家族相似性[J].外语教学与研究,1996,28(4):14-19. 被引量:73
  • 5维特根斯坦 李步楼译.哲学研究[M].北京:商务印书馆,1996.31、7.
  • 6Halliday, M A K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar[M]. London: Edward Arnold, 1985/1994.
  • 7Langacker, R W. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar Vol.Ⅱ: Descriptive Application[M]. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 1991.
  • 8Croft, W & E J Wood. Construal operations in linguistics and artificial intelligence[A]. L Albertazzi. Meaning and Cognition: A Multidisciplinary Approach[C]. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2000. 51-78.
  • 9Lakoff, G & M Johnson. Metaphor We Live By[M]. Chicago: the University of Chicago Press, 1980.
  • 10Langacker, R W. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar Vol.Ⅰ: Theoretical Prerequisites[M]. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 1987.

共引文献127

同被引文献48

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部