期刊文献+

用体外产气量评定稻草添补矮象草的组合效应研究 被引量:4

Interaction between rice straw and dwarf elephant grass supplements on gas production of in vitro
下载PDF
导出
摘要 应用人工瘤胃技术,研究了稻草添补不同比例0%(DEG0)、25%(DEG25)、50%(DEG50)、75%(DEG75)及100%(DEG100)矮象草(DEG)体外混合发酵96h的累计产气量及其在产气量上的组合效应。累计产气量及产气速率随着DEG在混合发酵基质中比例的增加而增加。DEG50发酵至36h组合效应达到最大值,而DEG50与DEG75则在48h达到最大值,以后均随培养时间的延长而下降,但DEG50下降最慢,直到发酵终点96h,几乎所有混合发酵基质的组合效应值均达到显著水平(P<0.05)。就产气量而言,反刍动物稻草日粮添补矮象草的比例以占整个日粮总量的50%~75%为宜。 In vitro gas production after 96 h incubation was measured to investigate associative effects of rice straw (RS)and dwarf elephantgrass(DEG).The treatments were combinations of DEG(0 %,25 %,50 %,75 % and 100 %)with RS (DEG0, DEG25, DEG50, DEG75 and DEG 100 respectively ).Gas volume and rate of GP increased with increasing levels of DEG inclusion,The associative effects(AE)of supplementing RS with DEG reached maxima when incubated till 36 h for DEG50,48 h for DEG25 and DEG75 respectively,and drop slowly after 36 h for DEG50,48 h for DEG25 and DEG75 ,and AE of AH50 was highest among these treatments.Almost all the differences of AE for various treatments were significant at any incubation time,This research concluded that ruminant RS basal diet supplemented 50 % - 75 % DEG was optimal.
出处 《中国饲料》 北大核心 2008年第6期12-15,共4页 China Feed
基金 江西省农业科学院科技创新及成果转化基金
关键词 体外发酵 稻草 矮象草 组合效应 in vitro fermentation rice straws dwarf elephantgrass associative effects
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1张吉鹍,刘建新.用压力传感器产气技术评定玉米秸秆添补苜蓿的组合效应[J].中国畜牧杂志,2007,43(21):40-43. 被引量:11
  • 2AOAC.Official Methods of Analysis.Association of Official Analytical Chemists (15th Ed.)[M],Washington D C,USA:Assoc Offic Anal Chem, 1990,69-90.
  • 3Blummel M,Becker K.The degradability characteristic of 54 roughages and neutral detergent fibre as described by gas production and their relationship to voluntary feed intake [J].Br J Nutr, 1997 , 77: 757-768.
  • 4Chenost M,Deverre F,Aufrere J,et al.The use of gasest technique for predicting the feeding value forage plants [A].In vitro Techniques for Measuring Nutrient Supply to Ruminants [C];University of Reading,UK:Proceed- ings of Occasional Meeting of the British Society of Animal Science, 1997,8 -10.
  • 5Cone J W,Van Gelder A H,Driehuis F.Description of gas production profiles with a three-phasic model [J].Anim Feed Sci Technol, 1997,66 : 31-45.
  • 6Cone J W ,Van Gelder A H.The influence of protein fermentation on gas production profiles [J].Anim Feed Sci Technol, 1999 , 76 : 251-264.
  • 7Grootj C J, Cone J W,Williams B A,et al.Multiphasic analysis of gas production kinetics for in vitro fermentation of ruminant feeds [J].Anim Feed Sci Technol, 1996,64 : 77-89.
  • 8Liu J X,Susenbeth A, Sildekum K H.ln vitro gas production measurements to evaluate interactions between untreated and chemically treated rice straws, grass hay and mulberry leaves [J].J Anim Sci,2002,80:517-524.
  • 9Mauricio R M,Mould M L,Dhanoa M S,et al.A semi-automated in vitro gas production technique for ruminant feedstuff evaluation [J].Anirn Feed Sci Technol, 1999,79 : 321 - 330.
  • 10φrskov E R,McDonald I.The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage [J].J Agric Sci(Camb), 1979,92:499-503.

二级参考文献10

  • 1Cone J W,Van Gelder A H.The influence of protein fermentation on gas production profiles[J].Anim Feed Sci Technol,1999,76:251-264.
  • 2Grootj C J,Cone J W,Williams B A,et al.Multiphasic analysis of gas production kinetics for in vitro fermentation of ruminant feeds[J].Anim Feed Sci Technol,1996,64:77-89.
  • 3AOAC.Official Methods of Analysis.Association of Official Analytic al Chemists (15th Edition)[M].Washington D C:Assoc Offic Anal Chen,1990.69-90.
  • 4Van Soest P J,Robertson J B,Lowis B A.Methods for dietary fiber,neutral detergent fiber,and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nntrition[J].J Dairy Sci,1991,74:3583-3597.
  • 5Theodorou M K,Williams B A,Dhanoa M S,et al.A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds[J].AnimFeed Sci Technol,1994,48:185-197.
  • 6Mauricio R M,Mould M L,Dhanoa M S,et al.A semi-automated in vitro gas production technique for ruminant feedstuff evaluation[J].Anim Feed Sci Technol,1999,79:321-330.
  • 7φrskov E R,McDonald I.The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage[J].J Agric Sci(Camb),1979,92:499-503.
  • 8Liu J X,Susenbeth A,Südekum K H.In vitro gas production measurements to evaluate interactions between untreated and chemically treated rice straws,grass hay and mulberry leaves[J].J Anim Sci,2002,80:517-524.
  • 9Sampath K T,Wood C D,Prasad C S.Effect of urea and by-products on the in vitro fermentation of untreated and urea treated finger millet straw[J].J Sci Food Agric,1995,67:323-328.
  • 10Cone J W,Van Gelder A H,Driehuis F.Description of gas production profiles with a three-phasic model[J].Anim Feed Sci Technol,1997,66:31-45.

共引文献10

同被引文献52

  • 1郭雪峰,刘俊峰,孙丽斌,高军,张苏江.甘草提取物对绵羊瘤胃体外发酵及甲烷产量的影响[J].动物营养学报,2012,24(8):1548-1556. 被引量:19
  • 2冯宗慈,高民.通过比色测定瘤胃液氨氮含量方法的改进[J].内蒙古畜牧科学,1993(4):40-41. 被引量:422
  • 3张新平,李向林,万里强.正交设计在苜蓿青贮添加剂试验中的应用研究[J].草原与草坪,2006,26(1):28-32. 被引量:23
  • 4张吉鸥.粗饲料分级指数参数的模型化及粗饲料科学搭配的组合效应研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学动物科学与医学院.2004.26.
  • 5张显东.补饲淀粉对反刍动物饲料组合效应的影响及其机理研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2009.
  • 6卢德勋,谢崇文,朱兴运,等.现代反刍动物营养研究方法和特点[M].北京:农业出版社出版,1991:60-74.
  • 7Wanapat M, Puramongkon T, Siphuak W. Feeding of cassava hay for lactating dairy cows[J]. Asian-Aus J. Anim Sci, 2000, 13(4):478-482.
  • 8Wanapat M. Manipulation of cassava cultivation and utilization to improve protein to energy biomass for liverstock feeding in the tropics[J]. Asian-Aus J.Anim Sci, 2003, 16(4):463-472.
  • 9张吉鸥,刘建新.秸秆基础日粮添补苜蓿体外发酵特性及微生物氮合成的组合效应研究[D].杭州:浙江大学动物科学学院,2006,45-49.
  • 10AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 15th Edition[M]. Washington DC: Assoc. Offic. Anal. Chem., 1990, 69-90.

引证文献4

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部