期刊文献+

锁定钢板内固定治疗四肢骨不连的临床研究 被引量:19

The surgical technique and follow-up of the treatment with locking internal fixation on long bone nonunion of extremities
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价锁定钢板内固定治疗四肢长骨骨不连的临床疗效。方法对2003年2月至2006年10月应用锁定钢板内固定治疗61例骨不连患者的临床资料进行回顾性研究。其中男性44例,女性17例;年龄7~70岁,平均38岁。其中5例肱骨骨不连,33例股骨骨不连,23例胫骨骨不连。骨不连的原因包括内固定失效47例,外固定失败5例,感染9例。骨不连病程为10~156个月.平均19个月。42例使用LCP钢板内固定,19例使用LISS钢板内固定。55例采用自体髂骨植骨,3例在自体植骨的同时结合同种异体松质骨移植,3例采用同种异体松质骨结合人工骨移植。手术前、后根据膝关节协会评分系统(KSS)评分对47例膝关节周围骨不连患者的关节功能进行评估,85~100分为优,70~84分为良,60~69分为一般,〈60分为差。术前优29例,良8例,一般4例,差6例。结果所有患者均获得随访,随访时间6~24个月,平均12个月;骨折均在4~6个月内牢固连接,平均愈合时间4.8个月,无内植物松动、断裂等并发症。术后膝关节KSS评分,优35例,良7例,一般1例,差4例。结论锁定钢板内固定结合植骨术是治疗四肢长骨骨不连的有效方法。 Objective To report the outcome of long bone nonunion of humerus, femur and tibia treated with locking internal fixation and bone graft. Methods From February 2003 to October 2006, locking internal fixation and bone grafting were employed to treat 5 cases at hummers, 33 cases at femur, 23 cases at tibia. Forty-four of the patients were men, and 17 were women. The mean age was 38 years ( range 7-70 years). The nonunion had resulted from failure of internal fixation in 47 cases, failure of external fixation in 5 cases, infection in 9 cases. The history of nonunion lasted from 10 to 156 months ( mean 19 months). There were 42 patients treated with locking compression plate (LCP), and 19 patients with less invasive stabilization system (LISS). For bone grafting, autogenous ilium was used in 55 patients, autogenous ilium and allograft bone was used in 3 patients, allograft bone and Wright DBM artificial bone was used in 3 patients. Results All the 61 patients were followed up for an average 12 months (range 6-24 months) only to reveal solid bone union in all the fracture, with a mean healing time of 4. 8 months ( ranged from 4 to 6 months). No loosening or breakage of the implants occurred in this series. The Knee Society Scores (KSS) was used to evaluate knee function in 47 patients with peri-knee joint nonunion, excellent result were seen in 35 patients, good in 7 patients, fare in 1 patients, poor in 4 patients. Conclusion Locking internal fixation can be used to treat effectively bone nonunion at the hummers, femur and tibia.
出处 《中华外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第7期510-513,共4页 Chinese Journal of Surgery
关键词 骨折固定术 骨移植 骨不连 Fracture fixation,internal Bone transplantation Nonunion
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1万仑,张耀明,吕波,田秀荣,张金伦.交锁髓内针治疗粉碎性下肢长骨干骨折不愈合23例[J].中华创伤杂志,2001,17(3):145-147. 被引量:104
  • 2Nolting J, Wirbel J, Seekamp A, et al. Treatment of hypertrophic nonunion of the distal tibial shaft with percutaneously inserted locking plate Initial report on experience in g cases. Unfallchirurg, 2006,109:256-260.
  • 3Hailer YD, Hoffmann R. Management of a nonunion of the distal femur in osteoporotic bone with the internal fixation system LISS (less invasive stabilization system). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2006,126:350-353.
  • 4张长青,张开刚,李鸿帅,曾炳芳.应用LISS治疗下肢骨不连的初步报告[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2005,7(5):409-411. 被引量:42
  • 5Schutz M, Sudkamp NP. Revolution in plate osteosynthesis: new internal fixator systems. J Orthop Sci, 2003,8:252-258.
  • 6Egol KA, Kubiak EN, Fulkerson E, et al. Biomechanics of locked plates and screws. J Orthop Trauma,2004,18:488-493.
  • 7Stoffel K, Dieter U, Stachowiak G, et al. Biomechanical testing of the LCP-how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled? Injury ,2003,34 Suppl 2 : B11-19.
  • 8Kaab M J, Frenk A, Schmeling A, et al. Locked internal fixator: sensitivity of screw/plate stability to the correct insertion angle of the screw. J Orthop Trauma, 2004,18:483-487.
  • 9Schutz M, Muller M, Kaab M, et al. Less invasive stabilization system ( LISS ) in the treatment of distal femoral fractures. Acla Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech, 2003, 70:74-82.
  • 10Wagner M. General principles for the clinical use of the LCP. Injury, 2003,34Supp12 : B31-42.

二级参考文献21

  • 1刘长贵,罗先正,王宗仁,李强,郭艾.AO钢板与Grosse-Kempf带锁髓内钉治疗股骨干骨折比较[J].中华骨科杂志,1995,15(11):739-742. 被引量:196
  • 2Ricci AR, Yue JJ, Taffet R, Catalano JB, DeFalco RA, Wilkens KJ. Less invasive stabilization system for treatment of distal femur fractures. Am J Orthop, 2004, 33: 250-255.
  • 3Robert Frigg. Development of the locking compression plate.Injury, 2003, 34 (2 Suppl): 6-10.
  • 4Stoffel K, Dieter U, Gstachowiak G, Gachter A, Kuster MS.Biomechanical testing of the LCP: how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled? Injury, 2003, 34 (2 Suppl):11-19.
  • 5Korner J, Lill H, Muller LP, Rommens P, Schneider E, Linke B. The LCP-eoncept in the operative treatment of distal humerus fractures - biomechanical and surgical aspects. Injury,2003, 34 (2 Suppl): 20-30.
  • 6M. Wagner. General principles for the clinical use of the LCP.Injury, 2003, 34(2 Suppl): 31-42.
  • 7Sommer C, Gautier E, Muller M, Helfet DL, Wagner M. First clinical results of the Locking Compression Plate(LCP) . Injury, 2003, 34(2 Suppl):43-54.
  • 8Staubi A, De Simoni C, Babst R, Lobenhoffer P. TomoFix: a new LCP-concept for open for open wedge osteotomy of the medial proximal tibia - early results in 92 cases. Injury, 2003,34(2 Suppl): 55-62.
  • 9Gautier E , Sommer C. Guidelines for the clinical application of the LCP. Injury, 2003, 34(2 Suppl):63-76.
  • 10Wick M, Mullar E J, Kutscha-lissberg F, Hopf F, Muhr G,Periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures; LISS or retrograde intramedullary nailing? Problems with the use of minimally invasive technique. Unfallchirurg, 2004, 107: 181-188.

共引文献185

同被引文献124

引证文献19

二级引证文献76

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部