期刊文献+

耕作方式对土壤有机碳库的影响 被引量:49

Effects of Different Tillage Methods on Soil Organic Carbon Pool
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过在甘肃中部干旱半干旱农业区进行6a的田间定位试验,探讨了传统耕作(T)、免耕(NT)、免耕+秸秆覆盖(NTS)以及传统耕作+秸秆还田(TS)等处理对土壤有机碳库的影响。结果表明,在0-30cm土层中,NTS、TS、NT处理土壤有机碳含量分别比T处理提高了5.09%、2.64%和4.08%;与T处理相比,NTS、TS、NT处理土壤微生物量碳含量分别增加了69.67%、47.72%和33.22%。NTS、TS、NT处理有利于土壤有机碳的累积。不同处理(NTS、TS、NT、T)条件下土壤有机碳和微生物量碳在土壤剖面分布是随着土层深度的增加而呈现递减趋势。 In order to discuss the soil organic carbon pool under the different tillage methods in loess plateau semiarid area which was established in Dingxi of Gansu, the soil under different tillage conditions for 6 years was analyzed by chemical method. The results showed that notill with straw cover(NTS), conventional tillage with straw incorporated(TS) and no-till without straw cover(NT) increased soil organic carbon contents compared with conventional tillage without straw(T) by 5.09%42.64% and 4.08% respectively; no-till with straw cover(NTS), conventional tillage with straw incorporated(TS) and no-till without straw cover(NT) increased contents of microbial biomass carbon of soil compared with conventional tillage without straw(T) by 69.67%, 47.72% and 33.22% respectively. Conventional tillage with straw incorporated (TS), no-till without straw cover(NT) and conventional tillage with straw incorpomted(TS) to be more advantageous in developing the content of soil carbon. Soil organic carbon and microbial biomass carbon decreased with the increasing depth in soil profiles under different treatments (NTS, TS, NT and T).
出处 《农业环境科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第2期622-626,共5页 Journal of Agro-Environment Science
基金 ACIAR资助(LWR2/1999/094) 国家科技支撑计划(2006BAD15B06)
关键词 耕作方式 土壤有机碳 土壤微生物量碳 产量 tillage method soil carbon microbial biomass carbon yield
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Reicosky D C, Dugas W A, Torbert H A. Tillage-induced soil carbon dioxide loss from different cropping systems [J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 1997, 41: 105-118.
  • 2Morris D R, Gilbert R A, Reicosky D C, et al. Oxidation potentials of soil organic matter in histosols under different tillage methods [J]. Soil Science Society of A rnerica Journal, 2004, 68:817-826.
  • 3Schlesinger W H. Carbon sequestration in soils [J]. Science, 1999, 284: 2095.
  • 4Namr K L, Mrabet R. Influence of agricultural management on chemical quality of a clay soil of semi-arid Morocco [J]. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 2004, 39: 485-489.
  • 5Smith P, Pownlson D S. Considering manure and carbon sequestration[J]. Science, 2000, 287: 428-429.
  • 6沈宏,曹志洪,王志明.不同农田生态系统土壤碳库管理指数的研究[J].自然资源学报,1999,14(3):206-211. 被引量:53
  • 7梁爱珍,张晓平,杨学明,C.F.Drury.耕作方式对耕层黑土有机碳库储量的短期影响[J].中国农业科学,2006,39(6):1287-1293. 被引量:77
  • 8李德文,孟凡祥,史奕,陈欣.农业管理措施对土壤有机碳固存潜力影响的研究进展[J].农业系统科学与综合研究,2005,21(4):260-263. 被引量:14
  • 9Six J, Elliott T, Paustian K. Aggregate and soil organic matter dynanlics under conventional and no-tillage systems [J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1999, 63: 1350-1358.
  • 10Bayer C, Mielniczuk J, Amado T J C, et al. Organic matter storage in a sandy clay loam Acrisol affected by tillage and cropping systems in southern Brazil[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2000, 54: 101-109.

二级参考文献107

共引文献747

同被引文献1001

引证文献49

二级引证文献1102

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部