期刊文献+

小应变原岩状态下应力路径旋转对剪切模量的影响 被引量:3

Effect of stress path circumgyration on shear modulus under small strain and initial stress state
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以重塑土经K 0固结形成的试样为试验对象,采用英国GDS公司生产的STDTTS+UNSAT(7 kN/1700 kPa)型号高级应力路径三轴测试系统,研究了在小应变范围内应力路径旋转对土体剪切模量的影响以及剪切模量随应变变化的趋势。研究表明,在小应变范围内,剪切模量的初始值随试验应力路径与近期应力历史间的夹角θ的增大而增大,当两者完全相反时,应力路径旋转对土体在小应变条件下的剪切模量影响最大;完全一致时,其影响最弱。而且,在小应变范围内,割线剪切模量总是大于切线剪切模量;当剪切应变采用对数坐标表示时,剪切模量随着剪切应变的增加而衰减,且衰减的规律都可以表示为带有两个拐点的反S型曲线,经分析验证本文所得公式3可以对此特性进行很好地反映;但应力路径、应变范围不同其衰减幅度不同。 The test object was remolded soil after K 0 consolidation.Using advanced stress path triaxial system,STDTTS+UNSAT(7 kN/1700 kPa) produced by GDS of UK,the effect of stress path circumgyration on shear modulus and the trend of shear modulus along with variation of shear strain under small strain were studied.Some conclusions were drawn.Under the condition of small strain,the initial value of shear modulus increased along with the increment of angle θ between trail stress paths and recent stress history.If the two directions were entirely reverse,the effect of stress path circumgyration on shear modulus was the largest;if they coincided completely,the effect was very feeble.At the same time,under the condition of small strain,firstly,the secant shear modulus was always larger than the tangent shear modulus.Secondly,when the logarithmic coordinates were applied to describe shear strain,the decrease of shear modulus with shear strain could be expressed by reversed S shape curve with two inflexion points,and through analyzing and validating,the deduced equation could perfectly reflect this characteristic.Finally,different stress paths and strain areas would lead to different attenuation trends.
出处 《岩土工程学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第3期379-383,共5页 Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
关键词 K0固结 小应变 剪切模量 应力路径旋转 反S型曲线 K0 consolidation small strain shear modulus stress path circumgyration reversed S shape
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1BURLAND J B. Small is beautiful - the stiffness of soils at small strains[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1989, 26: 499 - 516.
  • 2PUZRIN A M, BURLAND J B. Non-linear model of small-strain behaviour of soils[J]. Geotechnique, 1998, 48(2): 217 - 233.
  • 3MAIR R J. Developments in geotechnical engineering research: application to tunnels and deep excavations[C].Proc Instn Civ Engrs Civ Engng, 1993, 2:27 - 41.
  • 4CLAYTON C R, KHATRUSH S A. A new device for measuring local axial strains on traxial specimens[J]. Geotechnique, 1986, 36(4): 593 - 597.
  • 5JARDINE R J, SYMES M J, BURLAND J B. The measurement of soil stiffness in the triaxial apparatus[J]. Geotechnique, 1984, 34(3): 323 - 340.
  • 6SCHOLEY G K, FROST J D, LOPRESTI D C, et al. A review of instrumentation for measuring small strains during triaxial testing of soil specimens[J]. Geotechnical Testing Journal, ASTM, 1994, 18(2): 137 - 156.
  • 7JARDINE R J, POTTS D M, BURLAND J B. Studies of the influence of non-linear stress-strain characteristics in soil-structure interaction[J]. Geotechnique, 1986, 36(3): 377 - 396.
  • 8FRANZIUS J H, POTTS D M, BURLAND J B. The influence of soil anisotropy and K0 on ground surface movements resulting from tunnel excavation[J]. Geotechnique, 2005, 55(3): 189 - 199.
  • 9ATKINSON J H, RICHARDSON D, STALLEBRASS S E. Effect of recent stress history on the stiffness of overconsolidated soil[J]. Geotechnique, 1990, 40(4): 531- 540.
  • 10WHITTLE A J, DEGROOT D J, LADD C C, SEAH T H. Model prediction of the anisotropic behaviour of Boston blue clay[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1994, 120(1): 199 - 224.

二级参考文献13

  • 1Mair R J.Developments in Geotechnical Engineering Research:Application to Tunnels and Deep Excavations[J].Proc Instn Civ Engrs Civ Engng,1993,2:27-41.
  • 2Burland J B.Small is Beautiful -The Stiffness of Soils at Small Strains[J].Canadian Geotechnical Journal,1989,26:499 -516.
  • 3Puzrin A M,Burland J B.Non-linear Model of Small-Strain Behaviour of Soils[J].Geotechnique,1998,48 (2):217-233.
  • 4Clayton C R,Khatrush S A.A New Device for Measuring Local Axial Strains on Traxial Specimens[J].Geotechnique,1986,36(4):593 -597.
  • 5Ng C W W,Lings M L,Simpson B,et al.An Approximate Analysis of the Three-dimensional Effects of Diaphragm Wall Installation[J].Geotechnique,1995,45 (3):497-507.
  • 6Abbiss C P.Shear Wave Measurements of the Elasticity of the Ground[J].Geotechnique,1981,31 (1):91-104.
  • 7Powell J J M,Butcher A P.Assessment of Ground Stiffness from Field and Laboratory Tests[C]//Proc 10th Eur Conf Soil Mech & Fdn Engng,Florence,1991,1:153-156.
  • 8Menkiti C O.Behavior of Clay and Clayey-sand with Particular Reference to Principal Stress Rotation[D].University of London,1995.
  • 9Jardine R J,Symes M J,Rurland J B.The Measurement of Soil Stiffness in the Triaxial Apparatus[J].Geotechnique,1984,34(3):323 -340.
  • 10Puzrin A M,Burland J B.A Logarithmic Stress Strain Function for Rocks and Soils[J].Geotechnique,1996,46(1):157-164.

同被引文献42

引证文献3

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部