期刊文献+

资产专用性、沉没投资与治理结构分析——基于交易成本与企业能力的观点 被引量:6

Asset Specificity,Sunk Investment and Governance Structure Analysis:Views of Transaction Costs and Firm Capabilities
下载PDF
导出
摘要 经典治理结构理论过于关注交易成本而具有片面性,治理结构分析应包括交易成本和企业能力两方面。资产专用性与沉没投资具有内在的关联性,沉没投资影响企业的能力和交易属性。通过对交易属性进行扩展,建立基于交易成本和企业能力的治理结构分析框架和用于实证检验的模型。 The traditional analysis of governance structures is limited to transaction costs only. Actually, it should involve both firm capability and transaction costs. Assets specificity and sunk investment are closely related to each other, and sunk investment influnces a firm's capabilities and attributes of transaction. Through expandition of the attributes of transaction, a new framework of governance analysis and a model for emperical test are proposed.
作者 王德建
机构地区 山东大学
出处 《山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第2期75-80,共6页 Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金 山东省博士后创新基金项目<生产性服务业与制造业互动发展机制研究>的阶段性研究成果
关键词 治理结构 交易成本 企业能力 模型 governance structure transaction costs firm capability model
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1奥利弗·E·Williamson.《资本主义经济制度》,段毅才,王伟译,北京:北京商务印书馆,2002年.
  • 2Teece D J, Pisano G, Shuen A. , Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 1997,18 (7) :509-533
  • 3王辑慈.《创新的空间-企业集群与区域发展》,北京:北京大学出版社,2003年,第73页.
  • 4安娜·格兰多里.《企业网络:组织和产业竞争力》,北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005年.
  • 5Michael G. Sidney G. The Co-evolution of Capabilities and Transaction Costs: Explaining the Institutional Structure of Production,Strategic Management Journal, 2005, 26:395-413.
  • 6Williamson OE. Strategy research: governance and competence perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 1999, 20(12) :1057-1105.
  • 7Dosi,G. (1994). 'Boundaries of the finn'. In G. Hodgson, W. Samuels, M. Tool( eds. ),The Elar Companion to Institutional and Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 1. Edward Elgar, Aldershot, pp. 229 -237.
  • 8Hoetker G. How much you know versus how well I know you : selecting a supplier for a technically innovative component. Strategic Management Journal, 2005, 26( 1 ) : 75-96.
  • 9杨瑞龙,冯健.企业间网络的效率边界:经济组织逻辑的重新审视[J].中国工业经济,2003(11):5-13. 被引量:115
  • 10Coase RE. The nature of the finn: influence. Journal of law, Economics, and Organization, 1988, 4: 33-48.

二级参考文献15

  • 1Robert G. Eccles( 1981 ), The Quasifirm in the Construction Industry. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 2 : 335 - 57.
  • 2Helfat and Teece( 1987), Vertical Integration and Risk Reduction. Journal of the Law, Economics, and Organization. 3 (1), Spring ,47 - 67.
  • 3J. Carlos. Jafillo(1988), On Strategic Networks. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 9,31-41.
  • 4Jones, Hcsterly and Borgatti(1997), A General Theory of Network Gcvernance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 22, No.4,911 - 945.
  • 5Neil, M. Kay(1998), Clusters of Collaboration: the Firm, Join Ventures, Alliances and Clubs. In Nicolai J. Foss and Brian J. Loasby, eds. , Economic Oganization, Capabilities and Coordination. Published by Routledge.
  • 6Langlois and Robertson(1995), Finns, Markets and Economic Change: a Dynamic Theory of Business Instituitions.Published by Routledge.
  • 7Miles and Snow(1986), Organizations: New Concepts for New Forms. California Management Review, Number 3, Spring 62 - 73.
  • 8Bart Nooteboom(1999), Inter- firm Alliances: Analysis and Design. Published by Routledge.
  • 9Piore and Sabel(1984), The Second Industrial Divide, New York: Basic Books.
  • 10Powell( 1990), Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization. Research in Organizational Behavior 12: 295 - 336.

共引文献114

同被引文献55

引证文献6

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部