期刊文献+

西南某水电站坝址区风化花岗岩工程地质性质分析 被引量:3

The physical and mechanical properties of weathered granite in the foundation of a hydropower station in southwest China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章对西南某大型水电站坝址区深厚层全风化和强风化花岗岩进行研究。将全、强风化花岗岩物理、水理及力学性质与新鲜岩体相应性质进行比较,并分析了花岗岩风化后吸水性增大、岩体软化、抗压抗剪强度减小的成因。对强风化花岗岩与新鲜花岗岩抗压强度进行了比较;拟合了风化花岗岩弹模、变形模量值与新鲜花岗岩相应模量的变化百分比关系曲线。研究结果表明:强风化花岗岩的干抗压强度为新鲜岩体的1/4-1/3,湿抗压强度为新鲜岩体的1/4-1/5;岩体弹性模量和变形模量与岩体的风化程度成反比例线性关系。 It is well known that the weathered action has declined the physical and mechanical property of rock, so the research on the relationship between the physical and mechanical property and the extent of weathering of the rock in large hydropower stations has great effects on how to choose the norm of the characteristics of the weathered rock and the parameters of the mechanics. The paper studied the completely-weathered and highly-weathered granite in the deep and thick stratum in the foundation of a great hydropower station in southwest, and it also analyze the characteristics of the granite such as its increase of absorption, soften and the decrease of shear strength after it weathered. And compared the compressive strength between the highly-weathered and fresh granite, simulated the percentage the trend of deformation modulus and elastic modulus of weathered-granite and fresh granite. The results showed that the compressive strength of highly-weathered granite when it is dry is 1/4 - 1/3 of the fresh, the compressive strength of highly-weathered granite when it is wet is 1/4 - 1/5 of the fresh, moreover, the elastic modulus and deformation modulus is linear and inverse ratio to the degree of the rock weathered.
出处 《中国地质灾害与防治学报》 CSCD 2008年第1期109-113,共5页 The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control
关键词 全风化 强风化 花岗岩 物理力学性质 completely-weathered highly-weathered granite physical and mechanical properties
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献33

  • 1陈坤泉,张培英.模拟开采抽水试验在基岩裂隙水评价中的应用[J].矿产保护与利用,2004,24(5):52-54. 被引量:2
  • 2张文华.花岗岩残积土的抗剪强度及土质边坡稳定分析[J].水文地质工程地质,1994,21(3):41-43. 被引量:34
  • 3韩爱果 聂德新 王小群.高拱坝建基面选择主控指标的选取[J].成都理工学院学报,2001,28:79-81.
  • 4巨广宏 等.深切河谷岩体风化卸荷及其工程应用研究.工程地质学报,2002,(10).
  • 5[1]Government of Hong Kong. Report on the slope failures at Sau Mau Ping August 1976[R], 1977.
  • 6[2]Lumb P. Slope failure in Hong Kong[J]. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology, 1975, 8:31~65.
  • 7[3]Bishop A W. Progressive failure-with special reference to mechanism causing it, Panel discussion[J]. Proceedings of Geotechnical Conference, 1967, 2:142~150.
  • 8[4]Janbu N. Soil compressibility as determined by oedometer and triaxial tests[J]. Proceedings of European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 1963, 1:19~25.
  • 9[5]Yamamuro J A, Lade P V. Steady-state concepts and static liquefaction of silty sands [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Environmental Engineering, ASCE, 1998, 124, (9):868~877.
  • 10[6]Law K T, Lee C F, Luan M, et al. Appraisal of performance of recompacted loose fill slopes [R]. Research Report to the Geotechnical Engineering Office. Government of Hong Kong, China, 1998.

共引文献99

同被引文献32

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部