期刊文献+

不同解剖部位皮肤斑贴试验结果比较和分析 被引量:11

Comparison and analysis on patch test results of different site
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较面部、前臂和背部三个部位同一产品局部封闭式斑贴试验结果的差异。方法:以2006年8月~2006年12月在北京空军总医院化妆品皮肤病专科门诊投诉化妆品过敏的患者为研究对象,判断标准采用《化妆品皮肤病诊断标准及处理原则总则》中的7项化妆品皮肤病诊断国家标准(GB17149.1~7-1997),统一登记表格记录化妆品皮肤病患者的病史资料及相关化妆品信息,分别在面部、前臂和背部进行同一产品的斑贴试验,对斑试结果进行统计学分析。结果:共112例患者完成了318个产品的斑贴试验,面部阳性反应例数最多,62例(占总患者的55.36%),84个产品(占总产品数的26.42%);其次为前臂,39例(34.82%),59个产品(18.55%);背部38例(33.93%),52个产品(16.35%)。面部和背部、面部和前臂斑试结果之间的差异有统计学意义,背部和前臂斑试结果之间的差异无统计学意义。结论:在进行化妆品的斑贴试验中,面部皮肤较前臂和背部敏感。 Objective To compare the different results of patch test which applied on face, forearm and back with the same product the patients had used. Methods The outpatients with cosmetic dermatosis were collected from Department of Dermatology, Air Force General Hospital between August and December in 2006, according to GB17149. 1~7 - 1997. The patients' case histories and the suspected cosmetics were recorded. The routine patch tests using the involved cosmetic products were carried out on each patient's face, forearm and back simultaneously. Results Totally, we performed patch tests on 112 patients with 318 products which they had used. The highest rate of positive reaction appeared on the face. There were 62 patients (55.36%) and 84 products (26.42%) showed positive reaction on face, 39 patients (34.82%) and 59 products (18.55%) on forearm, 38 patients (33.93%) and 52 products (16.35%) on back. Statistically, there was a significant difference between the results of patch tests applied on face and forearm, between face and back, but no difference between patch tests applied on back and forearm. Conclusion In cosmetic patch tests, the facial skin is more sensitive than that of forearm and back.
出处 《中国美容医学》 CAS 2008年第3期415-417,共3页 Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine
关键词 斑贴试验 刺激性接触性皮炎 过敏性接触性皮炎 皮肤屏障功能 patch test irritant contact dermatitis allergic contact dermatitis skin barrier function
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Guin JD.Use of consumer product ingredients for patch testing[J]. Dermatitis,2005,16(2):71-77.
  • 2蔡瑞康,刘玮,陈锐,等.《化妆品皮肤病诊断标准及处理原则》实施指南[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1999:73-74.
  • 3Jaimes JP,Liu A,Bhardwaj SS,et al.Optimizing reproducibility for clinical studies involving patch testing and application of topical preparations[J].Dermatitis,2006,17(3): 133-136.
  • 4刘娜,王学民,袁肖海,吴琰瑜,谈益妹,周玉田.体积和剂量对斑试皮肤反应结果的影响[J].中国美容医学,2005,14(3):344-346. 被引量:5
  • 5Wahlberg JE.Patch testing[M]. 4th ed.PJ. Frosch,Contact Dermatitis. Springer,2007:366-386.
  • 6Aramaki J,Loffler C,Kawana S,et al.lrritant patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate:interrelation between concentration and exposure time[J].Br J Dermatol,2001,145(5):704-708.
  • 7陈曹君,刘玮,孙才.不同斑试材料和加样剂量对斑试皮肤反应结果的影响[J].中国美容医学,2007,16(3):359-361. 被引量:1
  • 8张宏誉,支玉香,文利平,等.过敏反应及临床免疫学纲要[M].4版.天津:天津科技翻译出版公司,2005:151-168.
  • 9赵辨.临床皮肤病学[M].3版.南京:江苏科学技术出版社,2004:935-936.

二级参考文献21

  • 1赵辨.化妆品皮炎与化妆品管理[J].临床皮肤科杂志,1994,23(1):38-41. 被引量:15
  • 2刘娜,王学民,袁肖海,吴琰瑜,谈益妹,周玉田.体积和剂量对斑试皮肤反应结果的影响[J].中国美容医学,2005,14(3):344-346. 被引量:5
  • 3Loffler H,Haple R.Profile of irritant patch testing with detergent:sodium lauryl sulfate,sodium laureth sulfate and alkyl polyglucoside[J]. Contact Dermatitis,2003,48(1): 26-32.
  • 4Aramaki J, Loffler C, Kawana S, et al. Irritant patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate: interrelation between concentration and exposure time[J]. Br J Dermatol, 2001, 145(5):704-708.
  • 5Agner T,Serup J. Sodium lauryl sulphate for irritant patch testing- a dose-response study using bioengineering methods for determination of skin irritation[J]. J Invest Dermatol ,1990, 95(5):543-547.
  • 6Dykes P, Hall S, Marks R. The effect of area of application on the intensity of response to a cutaneous irritant[J]. Br J Dermal,1991,125(4):330-334.
  • 7Hinnen U, Elsner P, Burg G. Assessment of skin irritancy by 2short tests compared to acute irritation induced by sodiun lauryl sulfate[J]. Contact Dermatitis, 1995,33(4):236-239.
  • 8Brasch J, Becker D,Effendy I. Reproducibility of irritant patch test reactions to sodium lauryl sulfate in a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized study using clinical scoring[J]. Contact Dermatitis, 1999,41 (3): 150-155.
  • 9Tupker RA, Willis C, Berardesca E, et al. Guidelines on sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) exposure tests[J]. Contact Dermatitis,1997, 37(2): 53-69.
  • 10Frosch P, Kligman A. The Duhring chamber, an improved technique for epicutaneous testing of irritant and allergic reactions [J].Contact Dermatitis, 1979,5(2):73-81.

共引文献16

同被引文献111

引证文献11

二级引证文献60

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部