期刊文献+

中学生视力不良问题简易风险自评问卷的研制 被引量:1

Development of a brief self-administered risk questionnaire for poor vision of middle school students
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研制适合中学生的视力不良问题风险自评问卷。方法整个研究分为问卷编制和信度、效度考评两个阶段。其中,第一阶段包括7个步骤:(1)确立问卷目标定位、理论框架、指标编写原则和设置格式;(2)建立初始指标库;(3)专题小组讨论,初步筛选指标,编制初始问卷;(4)初始问卷预测试;(5)专家咨询;(6)采用G-P分析筛选指标;(7)专题小组讨论,确定最终问卷。第二阶段通过大规模现场调查对信度、效度进行评价,包括:(1)采用Pearson相关系数评价重测信度;(2)使用克朗巴赫仅系数评价内部一致性信度;(3)采用现场调查反馈意见评价表面效度;(4)通过探索性因子分析评价结构效度。采用分层整群抽样从湖南省中学生中随机抽取96个班的学生构成现场测试样本,并从中随机抽取4个班的学生构成重测样本。采用Epidata3.0建立数据库并录人数据,采用SPSS11.0进行统计分析。结果(1)第一阶段最终得到包括10个指标的中学生视力不良问题简易风险自评问卷。G-P分析显示,各指标的t检验结果P值均小于0,05;(2)重测Pearson相关系数为0.80,P〈0.05;问卷的克朗巴赫α系数为0,56;调查过程中问卷得到了填写学生的认可;因子分析共提取3个公因子,解释总变异的48.07%。结论中学生视力不良问题简易风险自评问卷具有良好的信度和效度。 Objective To develop a self-administered risk questionnaire for poor vision suitable to middle school students. Methods Two phases were conducted to develop the questionnaire, scale development and validation. Phase one included seven steps : ( 1 ) determining the objective, theoretical framework, principles and format for indicator writing; (2) setting up the preliminary indicator pool; (3) selecting indicators and forming pilot questionnaire through focus group; (4) testing the pilot questionnaire; (5) further correcting the questionnaire through expert consulting; (6) choosing indicators again using good-poor analysis ; and (7) shaping the final questionnaire. Phases two consisted of: ( 1 ) using the Pearson correlation coefficient to assess the test-retest relia- bility; (2) using the Cronbach's α coefficient to assess the internal consistency reliability; (3) using the feed- backs from field investigation to assess the face validity; and (4) using explanatory factor analysis to assess the construct validity. The students of 96 classes were selected at random in Hunan Province as the field test sample using stratified sampling and cluster sampling. And the students of four classes were chosen again from 96 classes to serve as the test-retest sample. Epidata 3.0 was used to build the database and SPSS 11.0 to analyze the data. Resuits ( 1 ) A brief self-administered risk questionnaire for poor vision of middle school students with 10 items was formed through phase one. Good-poor analysis showed t test result for each item was statistically significant ( P 〈 0.05 ). (2)The Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.80 ( P 〈 0.05 ) ; the Cronbach' s α coefficient was 0.56; the questionnaire was recognized by the students participating in field test; three common factors were extracted using explanatory factor analysis, accounting for 48.07% of total variation. Conclusion It was concluded that brief self-administered risk questionnaire for poor vision of middle school students was a reliable and valid tool.
出处 《中国行为医学科学》 CSCD 2008年第3期271-273,共3页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(30400355)
关键词 视力不良 风险 问卷 中学生 Poor vision Risk Questionnaire Middle school student
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1教育部体育卫生与艺术司.中国学生体质健康监测网络2002年监测报告.北京:高等教育出版社,2005.237.
  • 2Mutti DO, Zadnik K. The utility of three predictors of childhood myopia: a Bayesian analysis. Vision Res, 1995, 35: 1345-1352.
  • 3Mantyjarvi MI, Predicting of myopia progression in school children. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus, 1985, 22 : 71-75.
  • 4Mei Q, Rong Z. Early signs of myopia in Chinese schoolchildren. Optom Vis Sci, 1994, 71 : 14-16.
  • 5Mangione CM, Phillips RS, Seddon JM, et al. Development of the Activities of Daily Vision Scale' A measure of visual functional status. Med Care, 1992, 30: 1111-1126.
  • 6Ma SL, Shea JA, Galetta SL, et al. Self-reported visual dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: new data from the VFQ-25 and development of an MS-specific vision questionnaire. Am J Ophthalmol, 2002,133:686-692.
  • 7Gothwal VK, Lovie-Kitchin JE, Nutheti R, The development of the LV Prasad-Functional Vision Questionnaire: a measure of functional vision performance of visually impaired children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2003, 44: 4131-4139.
  • 8Aslam TM, Gilmour D, Hopkinson S, et al. The development and assessment of a self-perceived quality of vision questionnaire to test pseudophakic patients. Ophthalmic Epidemiol, 2004, 11 : 241-253.
  • 9何其才 魏文波 等.应用灰色模型预测中学生的近视率[J].中国学校卫生,1997,18(3):214-214.
  • 10Zadnik K. The Glenn A. Fry Award Lecture ( 1995 ). Myopia development in childhood. Optom Vis Sei, 1997, 74: 603-608.

二级参考文献20

  • 1He M, Zeng J, Liu Y, et al. Refractive error and visual impairment in urban children in southern China. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2004,45(3) :793-799.
  • 2Zhao J, Mao J, Luo R, et al. The progression of refractive error in school-age children: Shunyi district, China. Am J Ophthalmol, 2002, 134(5):735-743.
  • 3Zhao J, Pan X, Sui R, et al. Refractive Error Study in Children: results from Shunyi District, China. Am J Ophthalmol, 2000,129(4) :427-435.
  • 4Matsumma H, Hirai H. Prevalence of myopia and refractive changes in students from 3 to 17 years of age. Surv Ophthalmol, 1999,44(Suppl 1):109-115.
  • 5Morgan I, Rose K. How genetic is school myopia? Prog Retin Eye Res,2005,24(1):1-38.
  • 6Zadnik K, Mutti DO, Friedman NE,et al. Ocular predictors of the onset of juvenile myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1999,40(9): 1936-1943.
  • 7Goldsehmidt E. The mystery of myopia. Acta Ophthalmol Scand, 2003,81 (5) :431 - 436.
  • 8McCarty CA, Taylor HR, Myopia and vision 2020. Am J Ophthalmol,2000, 129(4) :525 - 527.
  • 9Lam CS, Goldschmidt E, Edwards MH.Prevalence of myopia in local and international schools in Hong Kong. Optom Vis Sci, 2004, 81(5):317 - 322.
  • 10Park DJ, Congdon NG. Evidence for an "epidemic" of myopia. Ann Acad Med Singapore, 2004,33(1) :21 - 26.

共引文献64

同被引文献9

  • 1张永东,张文蔚,赵虎.交通事故罹患者心理应激反应与应付方式的相关研究[J].中国行为医学科学,2006,15(5):453-454. 被引量:11
  • 2Matthews G,Dorn L,Hoyes TW,et al.Driver stress and performance on a driving simulator.Hum Factors,1998,40:136-149.
  • 3Gillian E,Matthews GGIendon Al,et al.Dimension of driver stress.Ergonomics,1989,32:585-602.
  • 4Ozkan T,Lajunen T,Ohliaou takis JE,et al.Cross-cultural differencesin driving skills:a comparision of six countries.Accid Anal Prev,2006,38:1011-1018.
  • 5Matthews G,Tsuda A,Xin G,et al.Individual differences in driverstress vulnerability in a Japanese sample.Ergonomics,1999,42:401-415.
  • 6Matthews G.Towards a transactional ergonomics for driver stress and fatigue.Theor Issues in Ergon Sci,2002,3:195-211.
  • 7Matthews G,Desmond PA,Joyner L,et al.Validation of the driver stress inventory and driver coping questionnaire.International Conference on Traffic and Transport Psychology,Valencia,Spain,1996,1-27.
  • 8张长军,李冲,范茂林,孙卫星,王鹏,王素红,曹红.机动车肇事驾驶员人格特征的对照研究[J].中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2009,18(1):63-64. 被引量:9
  • 9陈爽,冀国峰.职业驾驶员心理应激及其相关变量分析[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2002,16(12):822-824. 被引量:14

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部