摘要
司法能动或是司法克制体现了法官释法的意识形态。司法能动和司法克制是法官在司法中进行自由裁量时享有多大的自由或者受到多大的限制问题,并没有一个绝对的标准可供遵循。在我国当下,去除僵化的司法克制与无序的司法能动,并且实现司法克制下的司法能动应是明智的选择。
Judicial activism or judicial self-restraint indicates a judge' s ideology while construing law. They are relevant to what liberty a judge has or what restriction a judge is under while he/she exercises his/her discretion in judicial process. Thus there is no compulsory criterion to follow. For China, it is wise to get over rigid judicial restraint and disordered judicial activism while choosing judicial activism under judicial self-restraint.
出处
《现代法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第2期179-185,共7页
Modern Law Science
基金
司法部课题"司法能动性与司法解释的规制"(05SFB2029)
关键词
司法克制
司法能动
法律解释
judicial self-restraint
judicial activism
interpretation of law