期刊文献+

论被害人过错影响定罪量刑的根据 被引量:30

Comment on the Basis of Victims' Fault Influencing Conviction and Sentencing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 被害人过错影响定罪量刑的根据,西方有责任分担说和谴责性降低说两种学说。责任分担说从分析造成客观危害的原因入手,引出了被害人过错应当分担部分责任的结论;谴责性降低说着眼于加害人的主观面,提出了被害人过错会导致加害人应受谴责性降低的观点。两种学说均只揭示了事物的一个方面,并存在缺陷。主客观相统一是现代刑法的主轴,只有既重视主观又强调客观才能完整地说明被害人过错影响定罪量刑的根据。 On the basis of victim' s fault influencing conviction and sentencing, scholars in the West counties proposed two theories, the shared responsibility doctrine and the offender's culpability mitigated. By analyzing the causes the shared responsibility doctrine draws a conclusion that the victims should share responsibility. The latter focuses on the offender, and puts forward the viewpoint that the victim's fault mitigates the offender' s culpability. Both theories take a one-sided approach to the problem. Only by combining the two theories, can we completely explain the basis of victim' s fault impacting conviction and sentencing.
出处 《西南政法大学学报》 2008年第1期95-103,共9页 Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词 被害人过错 责任分担 谴责性降低 victim' s fault shared responsibility culpability mitigated
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1陈旭文.西方国家被害人过错的刑法意义[J].江南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2004,3(1):29-31. 被引量:59
  • 2[5]汉斯·海因里希·耶赛克,托马斯·魏根特.德国刑法教科书[M].徐久生,译.北京:中国法制出版社,2001:715.
  • 3李立众,刘代华.期待可能性理论研究[J].中外法学,1999,11(1):31-39. 被引量:103
  • 4马克昌.犯罪通论[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,1999.125.
  • 5[12]林钰雄.刑事理论与实践[M].台北:学林文化事业有限出版公司,2000:166.

二级参考文献10

  • 1丁银舟,郑鹤瑜.期待可能性理论与我国犯罪构成理论的完善[J].法商研究,1997,15(4):57-62. 被引量:72
  • 2姜伟.期待可能性理论评说[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),1994,16(1):23-27. 被引量:70
  • 3[5][德]汉斯·海因里希·耶塞克,等.德国刑法教科书[M].徐久生.北京:中国法制出版社,2001.
  • 4[1]Andrew Karmen. Crime Victims: An Introduction of Victimology[M]. Pacific Grove, Califonia:Brooks/Cole Publishing Company,1990.
  • 5[2]Tatjana Hrnle. Distribution of Punishment: The Role of a Victim's Perspective[J]. Buffalo Criminal Law Review,1999.
  • 6[4]Martin Wasik. Crime Seriousness and the Offender-Victim Relationship in Sentencing[A]. in Andrew Ashworth and Martin Wasik(ed.), Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory[C]. Oxford:Clarendon Press,1998.
  • 7[5]J Dressler. Provocation:Partial Justification or Partical Excuse?[J]. Modern Law Review,1988.
  • 8[6]Magistrates' Association. Sentencing Guidelines(1997)[Z]. guidelines on affray, assault occasioning actual bodily harm, common assault, violent disorder, and unlawful wounding.
  • 9[7]S Jeffreys, L Radford. Contributory Negligence or Being a Woman? The Car Rapist Case[A]. in P.Scraon and P.Gordon(eds.), Causes for Concern[C].1984.
  • 10[8]Magistrates' Association. Sentencing Guidelines(1993)[Z].

共引文献295

同被引文献245

引证文献30

二级引证文献149

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部