摘要
20世纪50年代,有人对晋代皇甫谧《针灸甲乙经》序中记述的张仲景诊王仲宣一案的真实性提出质疑,认为这仅是皇甫谧“主观”、“夸大”、“虚构”出来的“故事”,应当“扬弃”。本文则认为本案真实性不容否认,并从皇甫谧著作的可信性;王仲宣生平及与仲景相会的可能性;麻风病确有“不治,二十年后便成大患”类型三个方面加以论证,指出:考证本案的真实性,对于了解仲景生平事迹及对认识某种特殊类型麻风均有重要价值。
Query on the authenticity of the case record of Wang Zhongxuan′s case diagnosed by Zhang Zhongjing mentioned in Huangfu Mi′s Zhen Ju Jia Yi Jing of the Jin dynasty was raised in the 1950s. It was believed that Huangfu Mi′s idea was “subjective” “exaggerated” “fabricated” story which should be discarded. The truthfuiness of the case record is undeniable, since Huangfu Mi′s work was reliable, and there was possiblility of meeting between Wang and Zhang, and also the facts that “leprosy is incurable twenty years later”. This is of significance to the recognition of some special type of leprosy and the understanding of Zhang′s life.
出处
《中华医史杂志》
CAS
1997年第1期29-31,共3页
Chinese Journal of Medical History
关键词
张仲景
医案
考证
麻风病
Zhang Zhongjing, Medical case record, Investgation, Leprosy