期刊文献+

越南史籍对“中国”及“华夷”观念的诠释 被引量:10

Interpretations of the Concepts of "Zhongguo" and "Huayi" in Vietnamese Historical Writings
下载PDF
导出
摘要 越南自10世纪建立大越国后,便开始接受中国儒家学说,建立文庙。至陈朝时,更开科取士,以儒家经典作为选拔人才的标准,以中国官方所推崇的程朱学说为依归。其中《春秋》的夷夏之防和朱熹《通鉴纲目》的正统思想,对越南史家有深远的影响。越南史籍的正统论,其作用在分辨"正闰",又采用汉族政权惯用的"中国"以自称,以否定明朝的天朝和正统地位,将"居天下之中"的中国观念据为己有。可见中国古代的华夏与四夷观念,对周边民族有深远影响。中国周边的国家互相仿效,"中"与"外"、"华"与"夷"的概念在国与国之间变得模糊和混淆,也随着时间和空间的因素而转换。越南虽然在文化上深受中国儒家思想影响,但在政治上却对中国政权有所谴责,对政治和文化的归属有不同的立场。同时,因为以自我为中心的"中国"观和文化优越感,虽然称其周边的民族为蛮夷,却又不能接受别人称自己为夷,以致在与中国交往时出现了非常复杂的政治关系。 Vietnam adopted the Chinese literary language and Confucianism as early as the tenth century when the Da-Viet empire was built. As a result, all the romps of intellectual activities in Vietnam were mainly impregnated by the philosophical systems imported from China. A Confucian Temple of Literature, Van Mieu, was constructed in Hanoi in 1070 and civil service examinations which were based on Confucianism Classics were also implemented. However, the Chinese concepts of the "demarcation between the Chinese and barbarians" and "legitmate succession," which originated from the Churtqiu and Zhu Xi's Tongfian gang mu, were also adopted and reinforced in Vietnamese historical writings. Claiming themselves the "Middle Kingdom (zhongguo)" and the others "barbarians (yi)," they has created eonfusion in understanding the "center" and "periphery, " and developed complicated situations in Sino-Vietnamese relationships.
作者 李焯然
出处 《复旦学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第2期10-18,共9页 Fudan Journal(Social Sciences)
关键词 越南 史籍 儒学 中国 华夷 正统 Vietnam historical writings Confucianism Middle Kingdom huayi legitimate succession
  • 相关文献

参考文献47

  • 1Nguyen Ngoc Huy, “The Confucian Incursion into Vietnam”, in Walter H. Slote & George A. De Vos eds., Confucianism and Family,Albany:State University of New York Press,1998,pp.91-104.
  • 2John K,Whitmore,“Vietnamese Adaptations of Chinese Govemment Structure in the Fifteenth Century”,in Edgar Wickherg ed.,Historical Interaction of China and Vietnam:Institutional and Cultural Themes,Kansas:Center for East Asian Studies,University of Kansas,1969,pp.1-10.
  • 3朱云影.《中国政治制度对于日韩越的影响》.朱著.《中国文化对日韩越的影响》.台北:黎明文化事业股份有限公司,1981年.第407-438页.
  • 4李焯然.《明代国家理念的成立--明成祖与儒学》.新加坡图立大学学术论文第83种,1989年.
  • 5吴士连编,陈荆和校.《大越史记全书》<本纪>卷8.东京:东京大学东洋文化研究所,上册,1984年.第473页.
  • 6吴士连编,陈荆和校.《大越史记全书》<本纪>卷11.东京:东京大学东洋文化研究所,中册,1984年.第577页.
  • 7吴士连编,陈荆和校.《大越史记全书》<本纪>卷15.东京:东京大学东洋文化研究所,上册,1984年.第818页.
  • 8A.B. Woodside, “An Overview of the Vietnamese Examination System in the 1800's”, Vietnam and the Chinese Model, pp.170-181.
  • 9《大越史记全书》.卷10.第517页.
  • 10Mexander B. Woodside, “Early Ming Expansionism: China's Abortive Conquest of Vietnam”, in Papers on China, Voh 17, (1963), pp. 1 - 37.

共引文献5

同被引文献81

引证文献10

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部