摘要
"台湾孔子"沈光文,长期被认为早于郑成功收复台湾十年即在荷人统治下致力汉文教育和中华文化的传播;作为民族气节坚定的明遗民,向台湾人民传承了抗清不屈、眷怀故国的民族大义。然而,追溯这一造神运动的逻辑起点浙东史学大家全祖望的表彰原文,将沈光文的传世诗文作品放到明清易代的历史背景中深入推考,可以发现,这是完全虚妄的,不仅抹杀了明代郑成功时期台湾二十年的教育史、明代郑成功集团四十年的浴血抵抗史,更抹杀了至少一千多年的中华文化在台湾的传播史。
Shen Guangwen, well-acknowledged as the Confucius of Taiwan, in traditional thought had dedicated his life in the spread of Chinese culture under the Dutch rule ten years before Zheng Chenggong＇s reclaim of Taiwan＇s severity, and that as a loyalist faithful to the Ming Dynasty, he taught pepole in Taiwan with patriotism and his standing against the ruling of Qing. However, after a investigation of Shen Guangwen＇s poetic works and the article authored by Quan Zuwang the great literati in honor of Shen, which is the logical origin of deifying Shen, Shen＇s experiences and reputation are found to be all forfeited.
出处
《复旦学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第2期131-139,共9页
Fudan Journal（Social Sciences）
关键词
台湾地区
孔子
沈光文
全祖望
Confucius of Taiwan
Shen Guangwen
Quan Zuwang
