女性主义教育研究范式的发展与走向被引量：3

The Development and Trend of Feminism Education Research Paradigms

下载PDF

导出

摘要学院派女性主义教育研究已经成为教育研究中重要的一个理论分支,并且随着研究的议题与视角呈现多元化,研究的流派也林立纷繁。女性主义教育研究主要经历了二元因素分析研究范式、世界体系理论研究范式、知识实践研究范式和后现代主义研究范式。分析众多女性主义教育流派研究范式,彰显女性主义教育研究的发展脉络,对促进女性主义教育研究的进一步繁荣和实现教育平等与教育公平都具有重要的理论意义和现实意义。 The research of academic feminism education has become an important theoretical branch of educational research,and has shown multiple trends with the emergence of multiple issues and perspectives, and its research schools have also become intricate and proliferate. Feminism education research has experienced such various paradigms as the binary factors paradigm, the world system paradigm, the knowledge practice paradigm and the postmodernism paradigm. The analysis of the feminism education paradigms shows the development of feminism education,which contains great theoretical and practical significance for promoting the feminism education research to get further prosperity and achieve equality and equity in education.

作者苗学杰

机构地区西南大学教育学院

出处《外国教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第3期24-28,共5页 Studies in Foreign Education

关键词女性主义女性主义教育研究范式 feminism feminism education paradigm

分类号 G40-034 [文化科学—教育学原理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献12

1Philadelphia. Feminism in education- an introduction [M]. Open University Press, 1994. 51-73.
2徐辉.试析西方教育理论中的女性主义思潮[J].比较教育研究,2000(2):1-7. 被引量：36
3Aine M Humble,Carol A Morgaine.Placing feminist education within the three paradigms of knowledge and action [J]. Family Relations,Jul 2002,51 (3):200-202.
4强海燕.西方女性主义教育述评[J].华南师范大学学报（社会科学版）,2004(6):26-32. 被引量：18
5Firestone S. Dialectics of Sex [M]. New York. paladin, 1970. 198-199.
6伊曼纽尔·沃勒斯坦.现代世界体系(第一卷)[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1998.460.
7徐辉,章光洁.试析女性主义教育理论的分析模式[J].外国教育研究,2004,31(6):18-22. 被引量：7
8M. Rick Turner.Don't forget the women [J]. Black Issues in Higher Education,2001,10 (5):18,6.
9Martin Camoy.Education for Alternative Development[A]. Philip Altbach Gail Kelly (eds.),New Approaches to Comparative Education [C]. The University of Chicago Press.1986. 75-76.
10鲍晚兰主编.西方女性主义研究评介[M].北京:生活读书新知三联书店,1995.

二级参考文献48

1[1][2][3][9]Teaching in America,by George S. Morrison, Allyn and Bacon, New York, 2003,p.142,142,142,144.
2[4]Proceeding of the National Conference on Schools and Sex Role Stereotypes, November, 1972,National Education Association and U.S. Office of Education; Barbara Yates,Steve Wemer, David Rosen: We'll Do It Ourselves: Combatting Sexism In Education,Lincoin,Nebraska 1974,p.4.
3Gaby Weiner. Feminisms in Education:an introduction[M]. Philadelphia:Open University Press,1994. 51-73.
4Carlson,D. Ideological conflict and change in the sexuality curriculum. In J. Sears (Ed.),Sexuality and the curriculum[M]. New York:Teachers College Press,1992.
5Gilligan,C. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge [M]. MA:Harvard University Press,1982. 65.
6Maher,F. A. Toward a richer theory of feminist pedagogy:A comparison of "liberation'and "gender"models for teaching and leaming[J]. Journal of Education,1987,169(3):91-100.
7Hall,R. & Sandler,B. The classroom climate:A chilly one for women. Project on the Status and Education of Women [M]. Washington, D. C. : Association of American Colleges, 1982.
8Tisdell,E. J. Creating inclusive adult learning environments:Insights from multicultural education and feminist pedagogy[R]. Information Series No. 361. Columbus,OH:ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult,Career,and Vocational Education, 1995.
9Hooks,B. Talking back :Thinking feminist,think black.,Boston[M]. MA:South End Press,1989. 28.
10Hooks,B.Teaching to Transgress:Education as the Pracrice of Freedom[J]. Routledge,1994. 15.