期刊文献+

中国民法继受潘德克顿法学:引进、衰落和复兴 被引量:94

The Adoption of Pandekten Jurisprudence in China's Civil Law:Initiation,Decline and Revival
原文传递
导出
摘要 中国1992年明确宣布建立社会主义市场经济体制之后,开始了大规模的制定民法的工作,现在有必要对于民法立法技术层面的问题予以认真的思考。中国一百多年之前变法时,就已经引进了潘德克顿法学,以后还按照这一科学方法编制了自己的民法典。但是此时只是继受了潘德克顿法学的外在制度体系,即立法规则和语言体系;而没有继受其内在体系即思想体系,也就是支持这些制度体系的近现代法律人文主义思想。在上个世纪50年代大规模引进苏联法学之后,中国法对于民法人文主义思想和技术规则不但没有积极理解,反而采取批评的态度,以至于民法的规则体系被摧毁。这种法律思维一直没有认真清理过。由于市场经济体制的成功,民法作为市场经济体制下的基本法的地位,会在中国得以确立;民法中公民权利观念,会成为社会的共识;民法中的规则体系,比如支配权和请求权作为基本民事权利的划分、法律行为理论和制度、交易中的权利变动制度等,都会逐渐建立和完善。潘德克顿法学在中国正在走向复兴。 From 1992, when a socialist market economy was explicitly declared as the goal of reform, China started large-scale drafting of civil law. It is now time to have a serious look at issues concerning legislative techniques. More than a century ago, during its period of reform, China already introduced Pandekten jurisprudence, and subsequently drew up its own civil code on this basis. But this introduction involved only the external institutional system, namely legislative rules and the system of language, while the internal system, i.e. the modern legal humanism underlying the external system, was forsaken. After the massive importation of Soviet law in the 1950s, Chinese law did not value humanist thought and technical rules in civil law; on the contrary, these were criticized, to the extent that the system of rules in civil law was destroyed. This sort of legal thinking has never received seriously consideration. Due to the success of the market economy, the status of civil law as the basic law under the market economy will become established in China; the idea of people's rights will become a matter of social consensus; and a system of rules, including the division between right of dominion and right of claim as fundamental civil rights, theories and institutions related to legal acts, and a system of change of rights in transactions, will be gradually established and perfected. In a word, Pandekten jurisprudence is staging a comeback in China.
作者 孙宪忠
出处 《中国社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第2期88-102,共15页 Social Sciences in China
  • 相关文献

参考文献41

  • 1杨鸿烈.《中国法律发达史》(Jz卷),上海:商务印书馆,1930年,第350页.
  • 2《德国民法物权体系研究》,发表于梁慧星主编.《民商法论丛》第5卷,北京:法律出版社,1996年.
  • 3《德国当代物权法》,北京:法律出版社,1997年.
  • 4孙宪忠,汪志刚,袁震.侵权行为法立法学术报告会议述评[J].法学研究,2007,29(2):149-159. 被引量:12
  • 5杨鸿烈.《中国法律发达史》(下卷),第898页.
  • 6日本民法第176条,第177条,第178条.
  • 7王茵.《德国、法国、日本的物权变动立法模式比较研究》第10页注释,北京:商务印书馆,2003年.
  • 8王泽鉴.《民法物权·第一册》,台北:三民书局,2001年,第20页以下.
  • 9林纪东,郑玉波等主编.《新编六法参照法令判解全书》,台北:五南图书出版公司,1986年,第180页以下关于物权变动的各个条文的解释.
  • 10林纪东,郑玉波等主编.《新编六法参照法令判解全书》,五南图书出版公司,1986年版,第180页.

二级参考文献1

共引文献235

同被引文献1557

引证文献94

二级引证文献1081

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部