期刊文献+

想象空间的开创:《新史学》与“新小说”的互动

The Openning of Imagination Room:Interaction between"New Historiography"and New Fiction
原文传递
导出
摘要 历史叙述和文学叙述与近代民族国家的建构密切相关。1902年,梁启超发表《新史学》和提倡新小说,为沟通两种叙述进行了大胆设计:以小说作为历史教科书的设想,充实、重塑了中国小说的思想内涵;掘微新史学与新小说在文体及书法上的链接点,使新小说在文章学的层面被推上文学之最上乘的地位。两者共同开创的想象空间发挥着民族认同的巨大作用,但在新史未出、史学不振的当时,梁启超更为重视小说的想象魔力,新小说承担了更多的民族建构责任,并由此导致中国小说新与旧、传统与现代的转型。打通新史学和新小说的通道.是梁启超为启蒙话语谋求沟通形式的巨大转型的思维结果。钩沉两者的互动,有助于人们了解晚清小说改良运动从学术思想到文学想象的独特思路。 Liang Qichao's lauching New Fiction was internally related to "New Historiography" that had been published earlier the same year. Through the two medium, he initiated tow revolution in the circles of historiography and literature nearly at the same time. The aim was improving the management by the masses themselvse, and evolution of nation. This reflected that he took New Historiography as the headway of thought, and New Fiction as the inspiration of psychotoghy by intent. His intention was turning New Fiction into the good tool of pushing ahead with trend of nationalism though, and precipitating it to play the role of inspiration. In 1902, Liang Qichao pushed ahead with the nationalism by publishing "New Histori- ography" and lauching New Fiction. Looking from the aspect of literature, the interaction between them was strong. 1. It reflected Liang Qichao's enlightenment narrative tactics that took fiction as history text- book; 2. They searching for the common narration "writing method", made New fiction being pushed on the uppest chancel of literature at the sense of articleology. 3. The imagination room that was opened up by them played great role of national identification, but Liang Qichao more relied on the imagination magic power of fiction, so he made it take on greater responsibity for national construction, and opened the new literature field of imagining China through fiction. Searching after the interaction between them would contribute us to understand some unique thought way in the beginning of fiction reformation movement of Late Qing dynasty.
作者 李青果
出处 《学术月刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第3期97-103,共7页 Academic Monthly
关键词 梁启超《新史学》新小说“书法”群治 想象空间 Liang Qichao, "New Historiography", New Fiction, writting method, mass management, imagination room
  • 相关文献

参考文献47

  • 1梁启超.《新史学》.《清代学术概论》.第237,131页.北京,中国人民大学出版社,2004.
  • 2梁启超.《论小说与群治之关系》[J].新小说,1902,.
  • 3梁启超.《三十自述》.《梁启超全集》.第959页.北京出版社,1999.
  • 4梁启超:《新史学》,第10-12页.
  • 5葛兆光.《新史学》之后——1929年的中国历史学界[J].历史研究,2003(1):82-97. 被引量:26
  • 6张荫麟.近代中国学术史上之梁任公先生[J].学衡,1929,(67).
  • 7陈建华.《民族“想象”的魔力:论“小说界革命”与“群治”之关系》.李所喜主编.《梁启超与近代中国社会文化》.第799页.天津古籍出版社,2005.
  • 8桑兵.《梁启超的国学研究》.《国学与汉学--近代中外学界交往录》.第277页.杭州,浙江人民出版社,1999.
  • 9任公.《译印政治小说序》[J].清议报,1.
  • 10邱炜萲.《菽园赘谈·小说》.1897年刊本.

二级参考文献71

  • 1顾潮.顾颉刚与傅斯年在青壮年时代的交往[J].文史哲,1993(2):11-17. 被引量:3
  • 2葛兆光.“平生为不古不今之学”——读《陈寅恪集·书信集》的随感[J].读书,2001(11):59-68. 被引量:6
  • 3.《傅斯年选集》[M].天津人民出版社,1996年版.第83页.
  • 4王汎森.《晚清的政治概念与“新史学”》[A]..《中国近代思想与学术的系谱》[C].河北教育出版社,2001年.第165-196页.
  • 5王汎森.《民国的新史学及其批评者》[A].罗志田编.《20世纪的中国:学术与社会(史学卷)》[C].山东人民出版社,2001年版.第107-108页.
  • 6.《胡适文存》第2集[M].,.第22页.
  • 7.《新的崇拜:西潮冲击下近代中国思想权势的转移》[A].罗志田.《权势转移:近代中国的思想、社会与学术》[C].湖北人民出版社,1999年版.第19页.
  • 8.《陈寅恪集·书信集》[M].三联书店,2001.第171-172,173页.
  • 9《古史辨第一册自序》,《顾颉刚古史论文集》第1册,中华书局,1988年,第31、79页.
  • 10各省游学汇志栏[J].东方杂志,(1):79-79.

共引文献294

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部