期刊文献+

沈阳市皇姑区中小学生家庭生态足迹 被引量:3

Ecological footprints of primary and middle school student’s households in Huanggu District of Shenyang City
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用生态足迹成分法,分析了沈阳市皇姑区5所中小学校学生家庭消费对自然环境的影响。结果表明:食物是中小学生家庭生态足迹的主要消费项,占生态足迹总量的71%;从生态占用的土地类型构成看,耕地项最大,占总足迹的40%,是中小学校学生家庭消费所占用的主要土地类型;家庭收入高低与生态足迹大小并不呈正比例关系,收入高或低都可能产生较高的生态足迹。本研究结果有助于中小学生及其父母了解自己的消费对周围环境的影响,有利于提高中小学生的环境保护保意识。 The componential method of ecological footprint calculation was applied to analyze the effect of the student household' s consumption from five primary and middle schools on the environment in Huanggu District of Shenyang City. The results showed that the food was the biggest component of ecological footprint in primary and middle school students' households, accounting for 71% of the total personal ecological footprint. According to the types of land occupied by eco- logical footprint, arable land was the largest item, accounting for 40% of the total footprint. The income level of households was not directly related with the ecological footprint, for example, the low or high incomes might generate high ecological footprint. The results would be helpful for the primary and middle school students and their parents to understand the relation of their consumption and the surrounding environment and to enhance the students' consciousness of environmental protection.
出处 《生态学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第4期657-660,共4页 Chinese Journal of Ecology
基金 教育部优秀中青年教师基金项目(1711) 沈阳市教育局合作资助项目(8773)
关键词 中小学生家庭 消费结构 消费水平 生态足迹 环境压力 middle and primary school student' s households consumption structure consumption level ecological footprint environmental pressure.
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1常志华,陆兆华,马喜君,梁震.台州市城市生态足迹[J].生态学杂志,2007,26(1):83-87. 被引量:20
  • 2李定邦,金艳.基于生态足迹模型的家庭资源消费可持续性研究[J].华东理工大学学报(社会科学版),2005,20(2):39-44. 被引量:19
  • 3徐中民,张志强,程国栋,陈东景.中国1999年生态足迹计算与发展能力分析[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(2):280-285. 被引量:614
  • 4赵慧霞,姜鲁光.济南市城市居民生活消费的生态足迹[J].生态学杂志,2004,23(6):178-181. 被引量:29
  • 5Barrett J, Scott A, Lindfield S. 2001. Ecological Footprint of Liverpool: Developing Sustainable Scenarios. York : Stockholm Environment Institute.
  • 6Best Foot Forward. 2000. An Ecological Footprint Analysis of the Isle of Wight. Oxford: Seacourt Press Ltd.
  • 7Chambers N, Heap R, Jenkin N, et al. 2002. A Resource Flow and Ecological Footprint Analysis of Greater London. Oxford: Best Foot Forward Ltd.
  • 8Flint K. 2001. Institutional ecological footprint analysis: A case study for the University of Newcastle Australia. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 17 ( 2 ) : 48-62.
  • 9Simmons C, Lewis K, Barrett J. 2000. Two feet-two approaches : A component-based model of ecological footprint. Ecological Economics, 32 ( 3 ) : 375-380.
  • 10van Vuuren DP, Smeets EMW. 2000. Ecological footprints of Benin, Bhutan, Costa Rica and the Netherlands. Ecological Economics, 34( 1 ) : 115-130.

二级参考文献32

共引文献670

同被引文献67

引证文献3

二级引证文献244

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部