期刊文献+

节能建筑市场的信息不对称分析及对策 被引量:7

Information Asymmetry of Energy-Saving Building Market and Proposals
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在我国建筑节能市场中,存在着两种典型的信息不对称现象:一是节能建材及产品市场上,节能材料、部品及产品的生产商对称现象;二是节能建筑市场上,房地产开发商与消费者之间的信息不对称现象,这严重影响我国建筑节能市场秩序,造成节能建筑"市场失灵"。本文从节能建筑市场角度,分析了房地产开发商与消费者之间的信息不对称和逆向选择,结合国外经验和启示,提出建筑能效标识是政府解决节能建筑市场失灵的重要手段,并阐述政府建立建筑能效标识监管制度的主要政策思路。 Two typical types of "information asymmetry" occur in the Chinese energy-saving building market. One exists in the market of energy-saving products, materials, equipments, and products manufacturers. The other is between real estate companies and consumers. This badly impacts the market order, and results in "market failure" for energy-saving buildings. From the market point, the information asymmetry between real estate companies and consumers, and adverse selection, are analyzed. Inspired by experience from developed countries, the paper puts forward the proposal that "energy-efficiency labeling of building" is an effective way to help the government to solve the market failure, and illustrates the main route of policy that the Chinese government may adopt to establish the supervision system for energy-efficiency labeling of building.
出处 《西安电子科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 2008年第2期89-93,共5页 Journal of Xidian University:Social Science Edition
关键词 信息不对称 建筑能效 标识 Information asymmetry Energy Efficiency Labeling
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1[2]BROWN R,WEBBER C,KOOMEY J G.Status and future directions of the Energy Star program[J].Energy Policy,2002,27(5):505-520.
  • 2[3]WEBBER C,BROWN R,KOOMEY JG.Savings estimates for the Energy Star voluntary labeling program[J].Energy Policy,2000,28(15):1137-1149.
  • 3[4]US Department of Energy.Annual energy review 2000,Report No.DOE/EIA-0384(2000)[R].Washington,DC:EnergyInformation Administration,US Department of Energy:2001.
  • 4[5]US Department of Energy.Annual energy outlook 2000,with projections to 2020.Report No.DOE/EIA-0383(2000)[R].Washington,DC:Energy Information Administration,US Department of Energy:1999.
  • 5[6]US Environmental Protection Agency.The power to make a difference:achievements for 1999-in brief[R].Washington,DC:US Environmental Protection Agency,2000.
  • 6[7]KOOMEY J G,PIETTE M A,CRAMER M,etc.Efficiency improvements in US office equipment[J].Energy Policy,1996,24(12):1101-1110.
  • 7[8]MC WHINNEY M,FANARA A,CLARK R,etc.ENERGY STAR product specification development framework:using data and analysis to make program decisions[J].Energy Policy,2005,33:1613-1625.
  • 8[9]Natural Resources Canada.Regulatory Impact Analysis Statement[R].Canada Gazette:Canada's Energy EfficiencyRegulations,1994:24.
  • 9[10]MATOSOV Y.Review of activity on increasing the energy efficiency of residential and public buildings[C]// Proceedingsof the International experience on energy efficient buildings.the China sustainable energy program,2004:81-95.

同被引文献68

引证文献7

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部