期刊文献+

从构式角度看英语语句理解、改进及对二语习得的启示 被引量:2

Understanding of English Sentences from the Point of CG,Improvement,and Implications on Second Language Acquisition
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Goldberg的构式语法理论提出了一直未被人们重视的构式意义认知现实性的问题,使我们对英语语句的理解机制有了新认识.构式是形式、意义和功能的统一体,论元结构在构式意义及英语语句理解中起了关键作用.当然,Goldberg构式语法也存在一些不足.在借鉴Iwata模式基础上,笔者认为若能将动词的动态性意义与构式意义相结合会更加符合认知规律、有助于语句理解.同时笔者也讨论了构式研究对二语习得的启示. Goldberg's argument structure construction grammar (CG) puts onstage the ignored fact that the semantics of lexically unfilled constructions has cognitively real status. This insight helps us know more of the mechanism in sentence understanding. According to CG, grammatical description of all strata is understood to involve pairings of form, meaning and form. The argument structure plays the key role in acquiring the meaning of construction and sentences as well. Inevitably, CG grammar presents certain drawbacks. Mirroring from Iwata's model, the author argues that it will be beneficial to combine the dynamic meaning of a verb and construction meaning, which is more cognitively reasonable in understanding sentences. Also, the author poses the brief cues on SI.A drawn from the CG study.
作者 孙显云
出处 《陇东学院学报》 2008年第2期97-101,共5页 Journal of Longdong University
关键词 构式 论元结构 语句理解 Iwata 模式 二语习得 CG grammar construction sentence understanding Iwata model SLA
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献59

共引文献390

同被引文献21

  • 1赵金铭.教外国人汉语语法的一些原则问题[J].语言教学与研究,1994(2):4-20. 被引量:104
  • 2郑靓.句式语法对语言研究及外语教学的新启示[J].外语教学,2005,26(1):34-37. 被引量:19
  • 3李璐.构式语法及其对语言习得和教学的启示[J].江西教育学院学报,2006,27(5):85-88. 被引量:6
  • 4Goldberg A E. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1995.
  • 5Goldberg A E. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006: 69-92.
  • 6Shibatani M. The Grammar of Causative Constructions[M]. New York: Academic Press, 1976:39.
  • 7Comrie B. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989:169.
  • 8Dixon R M W, Aikhenvald AY. Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000 : 83.
  • 9Kemmer S, Verhagen A. The Grammar of Causatives and the Conceptual Structure of Events[J]. Cognitive Linguistics, 1994, (5):115-156.
  • 10Gilquin G. Corpus, Cognition and Causative Construetions[M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2010.

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部