期刊文献+

改良Barthel指数(简体中文版)量表评定脑卒中患者日常生活活动能力的效度和信度研究 被引量:809

Validity and reliability of the simplified Chinese version of modified Barthel index for Chinese stroke patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨改良Barthel指数(MBI)简体中文版评定脑卒中患者日常生活活动能力(ADL)的效度、信度和敏感度,为其临床广泛应用提供客观依据。方法共选取40例脑卒中患者,其中男26例,女14例;年龄(59.65±11.68)岁;病程(21.20±19.44)d。2名评定员使用MBI、原始Barthel指数(BI)和功能独立性测定(FIM)中的运动部分(M—FIM)对上述患者进行ADL评定,各量表分别评定3次。将MBI结果分别与BI、M—FIM结果进行Spearman相关性分析以检验MBI的效度;对不同评定员间的MBI结果进行等级间相关系数(ICC)分析以检验MBI的内部信度和评定员之间信度;对治疗前、后的MBI结果进行符号秩和检验和配对t检验,从而分析MBI敏感度。结果MBI结果与BI各项及总分均具有高度相关性(r=0.816~1.000,P〈0.01),与M—FIM总分也有高度相关性(r=0.935~0.981,P〈0.01);MBI在同一评定者及不同评定者间均有良好的信度(ICC=0.866~0.997);患者经治疗后,发现其MBI评定中的进食、修饰、穿衣、床椅转移、上下楼梯及总分项目与治疗前比较,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05),而BI评定中仅上下楼梯及总分项目差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05),表明MBI敏感度优于BI。结论MBI量表具有良好的效度、信度和敏感度,对评定脑卒中患者ADL具有重要意义。 Objective To study the validity, reliability and sensitivity of the simplified Chinese version of modified Barthel index (MBI) in evaluation of activities of daily living (ADL) of Chinese stroke patients. Methods Forty Chinese stroke patients (26 males and 14 females, aged 59.65 ± 11.68 years) participated in the study. The duration of the disease averaged 21.20 ± 19.44 days. All the patients were evaluated for three times with MBI, Barthel Index (BI) and the motor component of Functional Independence Measure (M-FIM) independently by twophysiatrists. Spearman correlation coefficients between MBI and Barthel index (BI) , between MBI and M-FIM were used to test the validity of MBI. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to test both interrater and intra rater reliability of MBI. Sensitivity of MBI was analyzed with the Wilcoxon signed rank test and paired t-test. Results MBIwas highly correlated with BIin each item and total score (r=0.816-1.000, P〈0.01), and with M-FIM in total score (r = 0. 935 -0. 981,P 〈 0.01 ). There were high reliability with MBI in the results collected by same assessor and different assessors (ICC = 0. 866 - 0. 997). Furthermore, MBI was more sensitive than BI in majorities of its items and its total scores as well. Conclusions MBI has good validity and reliability as well as sensitivity in assessment of ADL of Chinese stroke patients.
出处 《中华物理医学与康复杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第3期185-188,共4页 Chinese Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
关键词 脑卒中 BARTHEL指数 日常生活活动 效度 信度 Stroke ADL Barthel index Validity Reliability
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1南登岜.康复医学.北京:人民卫生出版社,2004:140—141.
  • 2Shah S,Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel IndeX for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol, 1989,42:703-709.
  • 3Eakin P, Baird H. The Community Dependency Index:a standardized assessment of need and measure of outcome for community occupational therapy. Br J Occup Ther, 1995,58 : 17-22.
  • 4Hachisuka K, Ogata H, Ohkkuma H, et al. Test-retest and inter-method reliability of the self-rating Barthel Index. Clin Rehabil, 1997,11 : 28 -35.
  • 5伍少玲,燕铁斌,黄利荣.简易智力测试量表的效度及信度研究[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2003,25(3):140-142. 被引量:128
  • 6Pedersen PM, Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, et al. Comprehensive assessment of activities of daily living in stroke. The copenhagen strokes study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1997,78:161-165.
  • 7Kwon S,Hartzema AG,Duncan PW,et al. Disability measures in stroke: relationship among the Barthel Index, the functional independence measure and the modified Rankin scale. Stroke, 2004, 35: 918-923.
  • 8柳卫民,郑丽芳,梅元武.脑卒中患者生活质量的评估及其影响因素[J].中国临床康复,2005,9(29):142-144. 被引量:15
  • 9Dennis W, Pamela W, Sue ML. Comparison of responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the motor component of the functional measure in stroke,the impact of using different methods for measuring responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol,2002,55:922-928.
  • 10Gosman-Hedstrom G, Svensson E. Parallel reliability of the functional independence measure and the Barthel ADL index. Disabil Rehabil, 2000,22:702-715.

二级参考文献16

  • 1沈渔 主编.精神病学:第三版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1980.298-301.
  • 2Gandek B, Ware JE Jr. Methods for validating and norming translations of health status questionnaires: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment.J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51(11):953-9.
  • 3Kwa VI, Limburg M, de Haan RJ. The role of cognitive impairment in the quality of life after ischaemic stroke.J Neurol 1996;243(8):599-604.
  • 4de Haan RJ, Limburg M, Van der Meulen JH, et al. Quality of life after stroke.Impact of stroke type and lesion location.Stroke 1995;26(3):402-8.
  • 5King RB. Quality of life after stroke. Stroke 1996;27(9):1467-72.
  • 6Neau JP, Ingrand P, Mouille-Brachet C, et al. Functional recovery and social outcome after cerebral infarction in young adults. Cerebrovasc Dis 1998;8(5):296-302.
  • 7Wyller TB, Sveen U, Sodring KM, et al. Subjective well-being one year after stroke. Clin Rehabil 1997;11(2):139-45.
  • 8Scott M. The NSW Aboriginal Vascular Health Program. N S W Public Health Bull 2002;13(7):152-4.
  • 9Butefisch C, Hummelsheim H, Denzler P,et al. Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. J Neurol Sci 1995;130(1):59-68.
  • 10Heiss WD, Kessler J, Thiel A, et al. Differential capacity of left and right hemispheric areas for compensation of poststroke aphasia.Ann Neurol 1999;45(4):430-8.

共引文献144

同被引文献7230

引证文献809

二级引证文献6367

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部