期刊文献+

城市固体废物处理处置技术政策方法 Ⅱ.案例分析 被引量:8

Method of Technology Choosing of Municipal Solid Waste Treatment and Disposal Ⅱ. A Case Study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以我国城市生活垃圾处理处置技术体系为案例,通过经济性分析,利用已建立的物质流与经济性综合评价最优化模型,对不同情景进行了蒙特卡罗法数值模拟,并进行了参数的灵敏度分析。结果表明,在一般条件下,家庭物质回收和二次物质回收后,采用沼气发电和渗滤液回灌的卫生填埋对垃圾进行处置是模型建议采用的处理处置技术体系,此时生活垃圾中的C,H,O,N,S5种元素的最终流向主要为回收利用部分、填埋体部分和填埋气部分。在填埋费用昂贵条件下,家庭物质回收和二次物质回收后,对垃圾进行分选,分别进行焚烧、堆肥和填埋的选择频率达到70%,是模型选择的经济性最优处理处置技术体系。灵敏度分析表明,分选垃圾的沼气发电收益,卫生填埋费用,分选垃圾大型发电费用,大型炉排炉费用,卫生填埋发电收益等参数对技术政策选择影响最大。 Taking technology system of municipal solid waste (MSW) treatment and disposal in China as a case, Mento-Carlo numerical simulation and sensitivity analysis are studied in several typical scenarios by using the material flow and economy optimization model constructed previously. The simulation results show that, under the general condition, sanitary landfill with leachate re-circulation and power generation is supported by the model as the economically optimal technology, and the five main elements (C, H, O, N, S) will go to recycle, landfill and biogas. With the assumption of high landfill price, the pickup frequency of MSW separation at facilities as the optimal technology system is 70% . The result of sensitivity analysis shows that the power generation profit of biogas, the cost of sanitary landfill, large-scale power generation cost of separated MSW, and the cost of large-scale grate furnace are the most sensitive parameters for the decision making of technology.
出处 《北京大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第2期217-223,共7页 Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis
关键词 城市生活垃圾 物质流与经济性 最优化模型 蒙特卡罗法 技术政策 灵敏度分析 municipal solid waste (MSW) material flow and economy optimization model Mento-Carlo method technology decision making sensitivity analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1王斌,邢可霞,郭怀成.城市固体废物规划方法研究述评[J].重庆环境科学,2003,25(10):83-86. 被引量:7
  • 2王海燕.循环经济理论下的城市固体废物物流系统优化模型[J].物流技术,2005,24(10):287-289. 被引量:2
  • 3Costi P. An environmentally sustainable decision model for urban solid waste management. Waste Management, 2004, 24(3) : 277-295.
  • 4Kumar A, Sud A, Mantripragada K. Dynamic sensitivity analysis of the probit dose-response model used in the risk assessment of a municipal solid waste incinerator // Proceedings of the 1998 91 ^st Annual Meeting & Exposition of the Air & Waste Management Association. San Diego, 1998.
  • 5Chang S, Nishat S. Integrated solid waste management for the City of Greensboro, NC: A linear programming model. Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management, 2005, 31(4) : 169-186.
  • 6曾光明,袁兴中,张盼月,曾北危,郭怀成,GordonG.H.Huang,L.Hemelaar.固体废物管理行业的环境投入产出模型及其应用[J].中国环境科学,1999,19(3):253-256. 被引量:8
  • 7D'Antonio G, Fabbricino M, Pirozzi F. Decisional model for integrated management of municipal solid waste--A case study. Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management, 2002, 28 ( 1 ) : 28-43.
  • 8Jain A, Kaur H, Khanna S. Computer model for municipal solid waste treatment in developing countries. Environmental Science and Technology, 2005, 39(10): 3732-3735.
  • 9赵岩,司继涛,田保国,王洪涛,陆文静.城市固体废物处理处置技术政策方法 Ⅰ.模型研究[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2007,43(6):834-838. 被引量:9

二级参考文献31

共引文献22

同被引文献35

引证文献8

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部