期刊文献+

多Agent信念修正框架BeReFrame 被引量:1

BeReFrame:a Framework of Multi-Agent Belief Revision
下载PDF
导出
摘要 多Agent信念修正需要考虑多Agent系统的类型对信念修正的影响。在此提出了一个多Agent系统信念修正框架——BeReFrame。在BeReFrame中,Agent能够根据博弈论选择最优的修正策略去实现不同类型的多Agent系统中的信念修正目标。 The genre of different multi-agent systems,such as the cooperative MAS,the semi-competetive MAS,or the competitive MAS,could influence the mechanism of the multi-agent belief revision. BeReFrame,a framework of multi-agent belief revision,is provided in this paper. Within the BeReFrame,the agent in the different MAS can efficiently achieve the specific goal of belief revision using optimal strategy.
出处 《广西师范大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2008年第1期139-142,共4页 Journal of Guangxi Normal University:Natural Science Edition
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70771045)
关键词 多AGENT系统 信念修正 博弈论 multi-agent system, belief revision game theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1孙召春,高阳,贾松茂,陈世福.多Agent信念修正研究综述[J].广西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2003,21(1):74-80. 被引量:1
  • 2MALHEIRO B,OLIVEIRA E. Argumentation as distributed belief revision:conflict resolution in decentralised co-operative multi-agent systems [C]//Proceedings of EPIA. Berlin:Springer, 2001:205-218.
  • 3LIU Wei ,WILLIAMS M A. A Framework for multi-agent belief revision[J]. Studia Logica, 2001,67 (2) : 291-312.
  • 4DRAGONI A F,GIOGINI P. Distributed belief revision[C]//Proceedings of AAMAS. New York :ACM Press, 2003: 115-143.
  • 5PAGLIERI F,CASTELFRANCHI C. Revising beliefs through arguments gbridging the gap between argumentation and belief revision in MAS[C]//Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. Berlin:Springer, 2005:78-94.
  • 6JIN Yi,THIELSCHER M ,ZHANG Dong-mo. Mutual belief revision:semantics and computation[C]//Proceedings of AAAI. Menlo Park:AAAI Press, 2007 :440-445.
  • 7YANG Pei,GAO Yang ,CHEN Zhao-Qian,et al. Believability based iterated belief revision[C]//Proceedings of PRICAI. Berlin : Springer, 2004 : 936-937.
  • 8杨佩,高阳,陈兆乾.一种基于可信度的迭代信念修正方法[J].计算机研究与发展,2005,42(8):1293-1298. 被引量:2
  • 9JIN Yi ,THIELSCHER M. Iterated belief revision[C]//Proceedings of IJCAI. Berlin:Professional Book Center, 2005:478-483.

二级参考文献22

  • 1林作铨.常识问题常识推理的逻辑基础[J].计算机研究与发展,1997,34(6):407-414. 被引量:5
  • 2Y. Shoham, K. Tanaka. A dynamic theory of incentives in multiagent systems. In: Proe. the 15th Int'l Joim Conf. on Artificial Imelligence. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 1997. 626-631.
  • 3C. E. Alchourrdn, P. GSrdenfors, D. Makinson. On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions.Symbolic Logic, 1985, 50(2) : 510-530.
  • 4A. Darwiche, J. Pearl. On the logic of iterated belief revision.Artificial Intelligence, 1997, 89(1&2) : 1-29.
  • 5C. Boutilier. Revision sequences and nested conditionals. In:Proe. the 13th Int'l Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence. San Francimo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 1993. 519-525.
  • 6M. A. Williams. Collaborative belief revision. In: Proc. the 9th Int'l Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning. Berlin: Springer,2002.
  • 7J. P. Delgrande, A. C. Nayak, M. Pagnucco. Prolegomenon to a theory of conservative belief revision. In: Proc. the 18th Int'l Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 2003. 1391- 1393.
  • 8C. Areces, V. Becher. Iterable AGM functions. In: Frontier in Belief Revision. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 2001. 261-277.
  • 9O. Papini. Iterated revision operation stemming from the history of an agent's observation. In: Frontier in Belief Revision.Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 2001. 27.
  • 10M. Freund, D. Lehmann. Belief revision and rational inference.Leibniz Center for Research in Computer Science, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Tech. Rep. : 94-16, 1994.

共引文献1

同被引文献13

  • 1ALCHOURRON C, GARDENFORS P, MAKINSON D. On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions [J]. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1985, 50(2): 510-530.
  • 2AUCHER G. Generalizing AGM to a multi-Agent setting [ J]. Logic Journal of the IGPL, 2010, 18(4-) : 530 -558.
  • 3DELGRANDE J, JIN YI. Parallel belief revision [ C]//Proceedings of the 23rd National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Chicago: AAAI, 2008:430-435.
  • 4BALTAG A, SMETS S. Dynamic belief revision over multi-Agent plau- sibility models [ C]// LOFT 07: Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Logic and the Foundations of Game and Decision Theory. Livepeol: University of Liverpool, 2006:11 -24.
  • 5van BENTHEM J. Dynamic logic for belief revision[ J]. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, 2007, 17(2): 1 -27.
  • 6LIN FANGZHEN. On strongest necessary and weakest sufficient conditions [J]. Artificial Intelligence, 2001, 128(1): 143-159.
  • 7LIN FANGZHEN, REITER R. Forget it! [ C]//Proceedings of AAAI Fall Symposium on Relevanee. New Orleans: AAAI, 1994:154 - 159.
  • 8EITER T, WANG KEWEN. Semantic forgetting in answer set programming[ J]. Artificial Intelligence, 2008, 172(14) : 1644 - 1672.
  • 9LIN YUNGUO, WANG XIULI. Semantics of knowledge forgetting in alternating-time temporal epistemic logic [ C]//International Conference on Information Science and Engineering. Nanjing, China: [ s. n. ], 2009:389 -392.
  • 10王国俊.数理逻辑引论与归纳原理[M].北京:科学出版社,2000:16—40.

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部