“失语症”问题与比较诗学的使命

"Aphasia" Problem and the Mission of Comparative Literature

自从上世纪90年代中期曹顺庆先生提出文论"失语症"以来,学界对此问题一直争论不休,反对之声从未断绝。然而,如果冷静地理性地分析现当代文论的客观事实,会发现"失语症"确实存在着,并且由于文论的"失语症"而导致现代汉语批评某种程度的"失语"。面对当今文论"失语症",唯有脚踏实地进行我国文论的重建,才是当务之急。要利用比较诗学这个诗学间会通和"互惠"的利器来充分地开掘我国传统文论及西方诗学的资源。在保持传统文论"异质性"的前提下,立足当下文学和文论发展的实际,建立起既根植于我国传统文化肥沃的土壤之中又具有世界眼光和发展前景能和西方及世界文论自由对话的生机勃勃的新文论。

Since the last century and the mid-1990s, Mr. Cao Shunqing pointed out ＂aphasia＂ of literary theory, This issue has been debated all long. However, if we calmly rational analyse the objective fact of contemporary literary theory, we will find that ＂aphasia＂ indeed exist. Due to the ＂aphasia＂, led to some degree of criticism in Modem Chinese ＂aphasia＂. On the face of today＇ s ＂aphasia＂ of literary theory, It is critical that we are practical for the reconstruction of our literary theory. We should take advantage of comparative Poetics to fully exploit our heritage of literary theory and Western Poetics resources. On maintaining our euhural heritage ＂heterogeneity＂ of the premise and based on current literature, and euhural development of the theory, Establishing the new literary theory which both rooted in the fertile soil of our cultural heritage and have the world perspective in the world.