期刊文献+

腹腔镜与开放性膀胱全切并全去带乙状结肠新膀胱术疗效比较 被引量:6

Comparation of the therapeutic effects of laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC-NB) and open radical cystectomy (ORC-NB) with orthotop sigmoid colon neobladder
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较腹腔镜与开放性手术施行膀胱全切除并全去带乙状结肠新膀胱术的疗效。方法:对2000年2月至2006年12月施行的膀胱全切除并全去带乙状结肠新膀胱术85例患者进行围手术期评估,根据手术方法不同分为腹腔镜组(A组,41例)和开放手术组(B组,44例);对两种术式的手术方法、手术时间、术中出血量、术后疗效、住院期间并发症以及术后住院时间进行比较分析。结果:平均手术时间A组456.88min,B组398.86min。术中平均出血量A组534mL,B组831mL。术后肠道功能恢复时间A组3.56d,B组4.32d,两组手术组织切缘均无肿瘤。盆腔淋巴结清扫阳性率A组2.4%(1例),B组6.8%(3例)。住院期间并发症(近期并发症),A组总并发症发生率19.5%,B组总并发症发生率27.3%。A组有1例围手术期死亡。结论:腹腔镜膀胱全切并全去带乙状结肠新膀胱术比开放性手术出血少,肠道功能恢复快,并发症少,但手术时间较长。 Objective To compare the therapeutic effect of laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC-NB) and open radical cystectomy (ORC-NB) with orthotop sigmoid colon neobladder. Methods Eighty-five patients were evaluated including 41 undergoing LRC-NB ( Group A) and 44 ORC-NB ( Group B) from Febrary 2000 to December 2006 at our institution. The parameters for analysis included operative time, surgical method, blood loss, therapeutic effect, complications and hospital stay. Statistics included t-test and X^2-test (P 〈 0.05 was considered statistically significant). Results There was no significant difference in factors of patients at baseline between both groups. The mean operative time was 456.88 rain in Group A vs 398.86 min in Group B. The mean intraoperative blood loss was 534 mL in Group A vs 831 mL in Group B. The mean recovery time of intestinal function was 3.56 d in Group A vs 4.32 d in Group B. The positive rates of pelvic ymphadenectomy was 2.4% ( 1 case) in Group A and 6.8% (3 cases) in Group B. The complication rate of Group A was 19.5%. By contrast, the complication rate of Group B was 27.3%. Group A had one case of perioperative death. Conclusion LRC-NB has better superiority than ORC-NB, showing fewer blood loss and surgical complication and sooner intestinal function, and then needing longer surgical time.
出处 《实用医学杂志》 CAS 2008年第6期948-950,共3页 The Journal of Practical Medicine
关键词 膀胱肿瘤 腹腔镜检查 淋巴结切除术 Bladder neoplasms Laparoscopy Lymph node excision
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献11

  • 1Parra RO, Andrus CH, Jones JP, et al. Laparoscopic cystectomy: initial report on a new treatment for the retained bladder[J]. J Urol,1992, 148(4): 1140-4.
  • 2Docimo SG, Moore RG, Adams J, et al. Laparoscopic bladderaugmentation using stomach [J]. Urology, 1995, 46(5): 565-9.
  • 3Denewer A, Kotb S, Hussein O, et al. Laparoscopic assisted cystectomy and lymphadenectomy for bladder cancer: initial experience [J]. World J Surg, 1999, 23(6): 608-11.
  • 4Sanchez-de-Badajoz E, Gallego-Perales JL, Reche-Rosado A, et al.Laparoscopic cystectomy and ileal conduit: case report [J]. JEndourol, 1995, 9(1 ): 59-62.
  • 5Puppo P, Perachino M, Riccioti G, et al. Laparoscopically assisted transvaginal radical cystectomy[J]. Eur Urol, 1995, 27(1): 80-4.
  • 6Gill IS, Kaouk JH, Meraney AM, et al. Laparoscopic radical cyste ctomy and continent orthotopic ileal neobladder performed completely intracorporeally: the initial experience [J ]. J Urol, 2002, 168 (1): 13-8.
  • 7Turk I, Deger S, Winkelmaun B, et al. Laparoscopic radical cystec tomy with continent urinary diversion (rectal sigmoid pouch) performed completely intracorporeally: the initial 5 cases [J]. J Urol, 2001, 165(6 Pt 1): 1863-6.
  • 8Leadbetter WF. Consideration of problems incident to performanceof uretero-entero-stomy report of a technique [J]. J Urol, 1951, 65 (8): 818-23.
  • 9张鹏,郑少斌,刘成山,张辉见.膀胱原发性粘液腺癌1例报告[J].第一军医大学学报,2004,24(2):151-151. 被引量:1
  • 10黄健,姚友生,许可慰,郭正辉,江春,韩金利.腹腔镜下膀胱全切除原位回肠代膀胱术(附15例报告)[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2004,25(3):175-179. 被引量:100

共引文献23

同被引文献27

引证文献6

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部