期刊文献+

预期理论权重函数π的由来、质疑及Tversky的阐释 被引量:3

THE DEDUCTION OF A DECISION WEIGHT π:CONTROVERSIES,QUESTIONS,AND ANSWERS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 借助权重函数π的导出,Kahneman和Tversky解释了一些期望效用理论无法预测和描述的抉择(如艾勒悖论),使预期理论成为风险条件下行为决策的重要描述性模型.文章回顾了推导权重函数的基本假设及权重函数各特性的推导过程,介绍沿用相同的推导逻辑提出的对该函数特性的质疑,及Tversky对质疑的回应和解释.冀透过对权重函数的审视,将质疑的焦点转向最大化原则本身. A weighting ftmction π was developed by prospect theory to explain that Allais Paradox arises because people behave so as to maximize overall value rather than EU. The way that the decision weight π was derived from choices was reviewed. The controversies and questions to the propoesd properties of subadditive, overweighted low probabilities, subcertainty and subproportionality were presented and discussed with Tversky' s own wxplanation and answers. An attempt was made to draw the research attention from which function was being maximized to whether people behave as if they are trying to maximize“something”.
出处 《经济数学》 2007年第4期331-340,共10页 Journal of Quantitative Economics
基金 中国科学院"百人计划" 国家自然科学基金(70671099)资助.
关键词 1979年版预期理论 1992年版预期理论 权重函数π 权重函数 1979 version of prospect theory, 1992 version of prospect theory, decision weight π, decision weight w.
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

二级参考文献88

  • 1罗云峰,肖人彬,岳超源.关于认可制群决策准则的研究[J].系统工程理论方法应用,1993,2(3):45-49. 被引量:2
  • 2[1]Allais M. Le comportement de 1' homme mtionnel devant le risque:Critique des postulats et axiomes de l'ecole Americaine.Econometrica, 1953, 21:503-546
  • 3[2]Savage L. The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Wiley,1954
  • 4[3]Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 1979, 47:263-291
  • 5[4]Tversky A, Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory:Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1992, 5:297-323
  • 6[5]Allais M. An outline of my main contributions to economic science (Nobel Lecture). Theory and Decision, 1991, 30:1-26
  • 7[6]Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 1981, 211:453-458
  • 8[7]Li S. Can the conditions governing the framing effect be determined? Journal of Economic Psychology, 1998, 19:135-155
  • 9[8]Li S. What is wrong with Allais' certainty effect? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 1993, 6:271-281
  • 10[9]Li S, Adams A S. Is there something more important behind framing? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1995, 62:216-219

共引文献183

同被引文献83

  • 1李纾.艾勒悖论(Allais Paradox)另释[J].心理学报,2001,33(2):176-181. 被引量:17
  • 2胡坚,钱宥妮.中国消费者短视行为的理论与实证研究[J].山西财经大学学报,2005,27(2):5-10. 被引量:16
  • 3Ainslie, G, and N. Haslam (1992) : "Hyperbolic Discounting" in Choice Over Time, ed. by G. Loewenstein, and J. Elster, chap. 3, pp. 57 -92. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • 4Benartzi, S and Thaler, R'Myopic, Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle[J], Quarterly Joumal of Economics, 1995, 110: 73-92.
  • 5Kahneman, D. & Tverskey, A., Prospect Theory:An Analysis of Decision Under Risk[J], Econometrica, 1979 (47) : 263-291.
  • 6Laibson D I., Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting[J], Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997, (112) : 443-477.
  • 7Wendner, R. Do Habits Raise Consumption Growth?[J], Research in Economics,2003, (57) : 151 - 163.
  • 8Anderson,C.J. The psychology of doing nothing:Forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion[J].Psychological Bulletin,2003,(01):139-166.
  • 9Anderson,N.H,Shanteau,J.C. Information integration in risky decision making[J].Journal of Experimental psychology,1970,(03):441-451.
  • 10Baron;J;李纾;梁竹苑.思维与决策[M]北京:中国轻工业出版社,2009.

引证文献3

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部