期刊文献+

农杆菌介导大豆子叶节转化系统的优化 被引量:23

Optimization of the Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation Systems of Soybean Cotyledonary Node
下载PDF
导出
摘要 【目的】研究影响大豆(Glycine maxL.)子叶节外植体遗传转化的因素。【方法】以农杆菌转化系统为平台,用直接筛选法和延迟筛选法确定卡那霉素的筛选方法和浓度,以GUS基因的瞬时表达计算子叶节区GUS阳性率。【结果】延迟7d进行Km选择、筛选压力为75mg·L-1时选择效果最好;菌株培养阶段和侵染浓度分别在OD600为0.6和0.5时子叶节区GUS阳性率最高;黑农35、绥农14和合丰35为易感的大豆基因型;农杆菌菌株EHA101对大豆的转化能力好于LBA4404和AGL1;共培养培养基中添加的硫醇类化合物对T-DNA的转移有极强的影响效应。【结论】本实验方法可以优化农杆菌介导的大豆子叶节转化系统。 [Objective] The factors influencing Agrobacterium-mediated soybean (Glycine max L.) cotyledonary node transformation were studied so as to improve the transformation frequency of soybean. [Method] Delayed selection and direct selection were conducted to determine selection method and concentration of Km. And percentage of GUS positive in cotyledonary nodes was calculated according to transient expression. [Result] The best selection result was obtained when the explants were cultured by delayed selection of seven days and at 75 ml·L^-1 of Km; the highest percentage of GUS positive in cotyledonary nodes was obtained when strain growth phase and infection concentration were at the level of OD600=0.6 and OD600=0.5, respectively. Heinong 35, Suinong 14 and Hefeng 35 were sensitive genotypes to Agrobacterium. The strain EHA101 had advantages in transformation to soybean over the strains LBA4404 and AGLI. Addition of thiol compounds to co-culture medium had significant effect on T-DNA delivery. [Conclusion] The procedure optimized the systems for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of soybean cotyledonary node.
出处 《中国农业科学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第4期971-977,共7页 Scientia Agricultura Sinica
基金 黑龙江省科技攻关项目(GB04B101)
关键词 大豆 子叶节 农杆菌 转化系统 T-DNA Soybean Cotyledonary node Agrobacterium Transformation system Transfer-DNA
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Pereira A. A transgenic perspective on plant functional genomics. Transgenic Research, 2000, 9: 245-260.
  • 2Donaldson P A, Simmonds D H. Susceptibility to Agrobacterium tumefaciens and cotyledonary node transformation in short-season soybean. Plant Cell Reports, 2000, 19: 478-484.
  • 3Di R, Purcell V, Collins G B, Ghabrial S A. Production of transgenic soybean lines expressing the bean pod mottle virus coat protein precursor gene. Plant Cell Reports, 1996, 15: 746-750.
  • 4Hinchee M A W, Connor-Ward D V, Newell C A, McDonnell R E, Sato S J, Gasser C S, Fischhoff D A, Re D B, Fraley R T, Horsch R B Production of transgenic soybean plants using Agrobacterium- mediated DNA transfer. Bio/Technology, 1988, 6:915-922.
  • 5Stewart CN Jr, Adang M J, All J N, Barmy H R, Cardineau G, Tucker D, Parrot W A. Genetic transformation, recovery and characterization of fertile soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] transgenic for a synthetic Bacillus thuringensis crylAc gene. Plant Physiology, 1995, 112: 121-129.
  • 6Olhoft P M, Flagel L E, Donovan C M, Somers D A. Efficient soybean transformation using hygromycin B selection in the cotyledonarynode method. Planta, 2003, 5: 723-735.
  • 7王连铮 尹光初 等.大豆致瘤及基因转移研究[J].中国科学:B辑,1984,2:137-141.
  • 8Delzer B W, Somers D A, Orf J H. Agrobacterium tumefaciens susceptibility and plant regeneration of 10 soybean genotypes in maturity groups 00 to Ⅱ. Crop Science, 1990, 30: 320-322.
  • 9王慧中,徐志彦.Ti质粒在大豆中的表达初报[J].浙江农业大学学报,1995,21(2):217-218. 被引量:5
  • 10Zhang Z Y, Xiang A Q, Staswick Q, Clemente T E. The use of glufosinate selective agent in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of soybean. Plant Cell, llssue and Organ Culture, 1999, 56: 3746.

二级参考文献49

  • 1徐香玲,高晶,刘伟华,李集临.Ti质粒介导的B、t、k-δ内毒素蛋白基因转化大豆的初步研究[J].大豆科学,1997,16(1):6-11. 被引量:49
  • 2Hinchee M A, Conner Ward D V, Newell C A, Medonnell R E, Sato S J, Gasser C S, Fischoff D A, Re D B, Fraler R T, Horsch R B. Production of transgenic soybean plants using Agrobacterium-mediated DNA transfer. Biotechnology, 1988, 6: 915-922.
  • 3Bailey M A, Boerma H R, Parrott W A. Inheritance of tumor formation in response to Agrobacterium tumefaciens in soybean. Crop Science, 1994, 34: 514-519.
  • 4Mauro A O, Pfeiffer T W, Collins G B. Inheritance of soybean susceptibility to Agrobacterium tumefaciens and its relationship to transformation. Crop Science, 1995, 35: 1 152-1 156.
  • 5Donaldson P A, Simmonds D H. Susceptibility to Agrobacterium tumefaciens and cotyledonary node transformation short-season soybean. Plant Cell Reports,2000,19: 478-484.
  • 6Wright M S, Koellwe S M, Hinchee M A, Carnes M G. Plant regeneration by organogenesis in Glycine max. Plant Cell Reports,1986,5:150-154.
  • 7Dir V Purcell, Collins G B, Habrial S G. Production of transgenic soybean lines expressing the bean pod mottle virus coat protein precursor gene. Plant Cell Rep,1996, 15: 746-750.
  • 8Zhang Zhanyuan, Xing Aiqiu. The use of glufosinateasase lectiveagentin Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of soybean. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture,1999, 56: 37-46.
  • 9DengXY(邓向阳) WeiZM(卫志明).Technique of transformation of soybean[J].植物生理学通讯,1998,34:381-387.
  • 10WangCT(王翠亭) WeiZM(卫志明).Genetic transformation of important Cereal Crops[J].植物生理学通讯,2001,38(2):105-110.

共引文献51

同被引文献376

引证文献23

二级引证文献79

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部