期刊文献+

认知、需求、情绪因素与大学生培养决策中的有限理性 被引量:3

Talent Cultivation of University: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Issues in cognition,motivation and affect
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文从行为科学的角度对大学生成长过程中的培养决策,因认知、需求、情绪因素的影响而导致的偏差进行分析研究,在此基础上提出大学生培养决策中"有限理性"的观点,为进一步促进大学生人才培养和素质拓展工作中的有效性,为提高大学生思想教育工作的专业化水平,构筑科学、合理的人才培养体系提供参考。 Cognitive,motivational and affective factors influence information processing, judgment and inference of negotiators. These factors may both bias or improve decision making in Talent Cultivation of University. The cognition perspective dominated within Talent Cultivation of University research of social psychology in last two decades although a growing number of social psychologists argued that "human behavior is better understood when cognition and motivation are considered together". As a basic step to further the understanding of the interplay of cognition and motivation in Talent Cultivation of University, this paper presented an overview of the recent literature of cognition and motivation (including affect) perspective on Talent Cultivation of University behavior.
作者 邓江
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2008年第2期507-510,共4页 Journal of Psychological Science
关键词 大学生培养 认知 需求 情绪 有限理性 talent cultivation of university, cognition, motivation, affect,bounded rationality
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Komorita S S. Interpersonal relations: Mixed - motive interaction. Annual Review of Psychology, 1995, 46:183 - 207
  • 2Janssen C. Cognitive theory and international Talent Cultivation of University. In: V. Kremenyuk. (Ed.). International Talent Cultivation of University: Analysis, Approaches, Issues. San Francisco:Joasey- Bass, 1991:229 - 243
  • 3De Dreu C K W, Carnevale P J. Motivational bases of information processing and strategy in conflict and Talent Cultivation of University. In : M Zanna. (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2003:235 - 291
  • 4Tversky A, Kahn man D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 1981, 211(4481) : 453 - 458
  • 5Lieberman N, Idson L C, Higgins E T. Predicting the intensity of losses vs. non-gains and non - losses vs. gains in judging fairness and value: A test of the loss aversion explanation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,2005, 41 : 527 - 534
  • 6Galinsky A D, Mussweiler T. First offers as anchors: The role of perspective - taking and negotiator focus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001, 81: 657-669

同被引文献32

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部