期刊文献+

文拉法辛缓释剂与多塞平治疗广泛焦虑症的对比观察 被引量:1

A comparative study of Venlafaxine XR and Doxepine in therapy of generalized anxiety disorder(GAD)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较文拉法辛缓释剂与多塞平治疗广泛焦虑症(GAD)的疗效与安全性。方法:将81例GAD患者随机分为文拉法辛组(42例)和多塞平组(39例),疗程4周。在治疗前和治疗后1、2、4周分别进行汉密尔顿焦虑量表、治疗时出现的症状量表评定疗效和不良反应。结果:文拉法辛与多塞平对GAD均有显著疗效,两组间无显著性差异。文拉法辛组不良反应明显小于多塞平组。结论:文拉法辛缓释剂治疗GAD安全有效,不良反应少。 Objective:To Compare the efficacy and safety of Venlafaxine XR and Doxepine in the treatment of GAD. Methods:81 patients with GAD were randomly divided into Venlafaxine group(n= 41 )and Doxepine group(n= 39). They were treated for 4 weeks. The clinical efficacy and side effects were evaluated with HAMA and TESS before treatment and 1.2.4 wecks after treatment. Results: There were significant efficacy and no significant difference in Venlafaxine grioup and Doxepine group. The side effecte in Venlafaxine group were significant lower than those in Doxeplne group. Conclusions: Venlafaxine XR showed efficacy and safety in the treatment of GAD with lower side effects.
出处 《中国冶金工业医学杂志》 2008年第2期140-141,共2页 Chinese Medical Journal of Metallurgical industry
关键词 文拉法辛 多塞平 广泛焦虑症 Venlafaxine Doxepine GAD
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Wittchen H-U, Zhao S, Kesslwer RC, et al. DSM-Ⅲ-R generalized anxiety disorderinthe National Cormmorbidity Survey [J]. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 1994,51 : 355-364.
  • 2Connor K M, Davidson JR T. T and neurobiology of generalized anxiety disordor[J]. Biol Psychiatry, 1998,44 : 1284.
  • 3中华医学会精神科分会编.中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准第3版(CCMD-3).济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001:106-107.
  • 4沈渔村主编.精神病学.4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2003:460-462.

共引文献6

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部