摘要
董事的注意义务是指董事在履行其职务时,他的技能水平应合理地从他的知识和经验来判断,不必展示出比此更高的水平。在英美法系已经出现:注意义务标准倾向客观化、专业化,行为标准与责任标准相分离,经营判断规则独立等趋势,较好解决了维护公司、股东利益和保护与激励公司董事之间的矛盾。而我国在2005年修订《公司法》中没有完全体现这一趋势。因此,应在法律实践中建立以客观标准为主,主客观相统一的综合性标准,明确董事注意义务内容及法律责任,谨慎引进经营判断规则,逐步减小我国法律与世界的差距。
Directors of the duty of care means the directors in the performance of their duties, he should be a reasonable level of skills from his knowledge and experience to judge, he need not demonstrate a higher level than this. In common law he has emerged: note obligations tendency objective standards of professionalism, standards of conduct and accountability standards phase separation, independent business judgment rule, such as trends, better solved the maintenance companies, the protection of the interest of shareholders and company directors and encouraging the contradiction between. In China in 2005 the amended " Company Law" does not fully reflect this trend. Therefore, we should establish the legal practice based on objective criteria, the objective and subjective unity comprehensive standards, a clear obligation to the attention of directors of the contents and liability and prudent business judgment rule introduced, gradually reducing our laws and the gap between the worlds.
出处
《宜宾学院学报》
2008年第1期73-76,共4页
Journal of Yibin University
基金
西南政法大学经济法学科硕博科研项目:公司法理结构问题研究(课题号SBY002)
关键词
董事注意义务
标准趋势
立法完善
Directors Attention Obligations
Standards Trends
Legislative Perfection