证据不足不起诉的国家赔偿问题新论

New Discussion on State Compensation of Nol Pros for Insufficiency of Evidence

不起诉可分为法定不起诉、酌定不起诉和证据不足的不起诉。目前,学界对于前两者的相关当事人不予国家赔偿已无争议。问题的关键在于证据不足不起诉是否应纳入国家赔偿的范围。笔者从不起诉的概念分类入手,结合问题产生的根源,分析证据不足不起诉的核心;对于证据不足不起诉当事人的逮捕是否属于赔偿法所规定的错捕错拘的范围,并联系最高司法部门的相关解释,得出自己的结论:对于证据不足不起诉案件,应当具体分析,赔偿与补偿相结合。

Non -prosecution can be categorized as statutory nol pros, discretionary nol pros, and nol pros for insufficiency of evidence. There is no question about the compensation of another two types, and the key is the nol pros for insufficiency of evidence. In the article, it begins from the category and the root of the item, and analyzes the core of the type whether the arrest belongs to the scope of the state compensation. With the explanation of the supreme judicial apartment, it gives the answer： we should analyze Specifically, unifying compensation and recovery.