期刊文献+

从情境理性看现代逻辑的论证理论及其转型 被引量:4

On the Argument Theory of Modern Logic and Its Transformation from a Perspective of Situated Reason
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以先验理性向情境理性的转变为背景,本文阐明了现代逻辑论证理论的普遍主义和先验主义预设及其存在的问题,认为非形式逻辑的若干尝试代表着逻辑学如何从先验性与后验性、普遍性与情境性的统一中去研究建构论证理论的努力。 Considering the transformation from transcendental reason to situated reason,this article elucidates the universalistic and aprioristic presupposition and its deficiencies in the argument theory of modern logic,maintains that some attempts made by informal logicians represent the endeavor of how logic to study argument from a perspective of the union of a priority and posteriority,and union of universality and contextuality.
作者 晋荣东
出处 《自然辩证法通讯》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第2期33-38,共6页 Journal of Dialectics of Nature
基金 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目(NCET-05-0426)
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Susan Haack. Philosophy of Logics[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.
  • 2陈波.一个与归纳问题类似的演绎问题——演绎的证成[J].中国社会科学,2005(2):84-95. 被引量:18
  • 3G. Iseminger. Logic and Philosophy: Selected Readings[ C]. New York: Appleton- Century- Crofts, 1968.
  • 4I.M. Copi et al. Contemporary Readings in logical Theory[M]. New York: Macmillan, 1967.
  • 5Jurgen Habermas. Postmetaphysical Thinking[M]. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992.
  • 6普特南.理性、真理与历史[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1997..
  • 7Kenneth Baynes et al. After Philosophy: End or Transformation?[C]. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1991.
  • 8冯契.认识世界和认识自己[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,1996.16.
  • 9Maurice A. Finocchiaro. Arguments about Arguments: Systematic, Critical and Historical Essays in Logic Theory[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
  • 10Stephen Toulmin. The Uses of Argument[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958.

二级参考文献9

  • 1Dummett M. A. E. , "Justification of Deduction". British Academy Lecture, reprinted in Dummett The Logical Basis of Metaphysics. Harvard University Press, 1991.
  • 2Haack S. , "Justification of Deduction", Mind 85, 1976.
  • 3Haack S. ,"Dummett's Justification of Deduction", Mind 95,1982.
  • 4Haack S. ,Deviant Logic 9 Fuzzy Logic : Beyond the Formalism 9 The University of Chicago University,1996.
  • 5Quine W. V. , "Truth By Convention". Philosophical Essays for A. N. Whitehead, O. H. Lee (editor),.New York.Longmans, 1936, pp. 90-124.
  • 6Quine W. V. ,"Two Dogmas of Empiricism". Philosophical Review (January 1951).
  • 7Quine W. V. ,"Carnap and Logical Truth". Synthese (December 1960), 12 (4): 350-374.
  • 8Quine W. V. ,Philosophy of Logic, second edition, Harvard University Press, 1986.
  • 9休谟 关文运译.《人性论》上册[M].商务印书馆,1997年..

共引文献89

同被引文献54

  • 1高德胜.“道德的勇敢”与道德勇气——兼论道德勇气的培育[J].教育研究与实验,2020,0(1):1-10. 被引量:22
  • 2刘云波,金鑫.基于多层线性模型的高职专业生产效率分析——以计算机类专业为例[J].高等教育研究,2014,35(11):68-76. 被引量:2
  • 3陈波.一个与归纳问题类似的演绎问题——演绎的证成[J].中国社会科学,2005(2):84-95. 被引量:18
  • 4[8]哈贝马斯.在事实与规范之间[M].童世骏,译.上海:三联书店,2003.
  • 5武宏志,周建武,唐坚,非形式逻辑导论,2009年,北京:人民出版社.
  • 6R. Audi, 1999, The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge Uni- versity Press.
  • 7E. M. Barth and E. C. Krabbe, 1982, From Axiom to Dialogue." A Philosophical Study of Logics and Argumentation, Berlin/New York: Walter de Gmyter.
  • 8R. D. Dearin, 1982, "Perelman's concept of quasi-logical argument: A critical elabo- ration", in J. R. Cox and C. A. Willard (eds.), Advances in Argumentation Theory and Research, OD. 78-94, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
  • 9F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst and A. F. Snoeck Henkemans, 1996, Fundamen- tals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contem- porary Developments, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • 10F. H. van Eemeren and R. Grootendorst, 1984, The Study of Argumentation, New York: Irvington.

引证文献4

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部