期刊文献+

“大而不倒”救助政策的理论和实证研究 被引量:6

Theory and Empirical Study on the Bailout Policy of"Too Big To Fail"
下载PDF
导出
摘要 由于大银行倒闭的巨大破坏性,最后贷款人在救助中通常奉行"大而不倒"政策。考虑到救助成本是银行资产规模的增函数,如果救助银行是最优的,那么救助任何一个更大的银行将也是最优的,这也意味着"大而不倒"救助政策在理论上的成立。在"大而不倒"政策下,规模和风险之间存在相互影响的关系。"大而不倒"救助政策影响银行的规模选择和资产风险的组合选择,导致银行追求变得更大且更具风险。 Owing to the devastating effect of the bankruptcy of big banks, the lender of last resort pursues the principle of "too big to fail" (TBTF) in the bailouts. Given that the bailout cost is an increasing function of the bank' s assets, if it is optimal to rescue a bank, then it would be optimal to rescue any larger banks. It means that the bailout policy of "TBTF" holds water in theory. Under the bailout policy of "TBTF" , the size of a bank and its risks interact. The bailout policy of "TBTF" has an impact on a bank' s choice of its size and portfolio selection and may lead the bank to become larger and more risky.
作者 危勇
机构地区 暨南大学
出处 《南方金融》 北大核心 2008年第3期24-29,共6页 South China Finance
基金 本论文为国家自然科学基金项目<商业银行利率风险综合计量模型及管理模式研究>(项目批准号70473032)研究成果。
关键词 最后贷款人 大而不倒 救助政策 Lender of Last Resort Too Big To Fail Bailout Policy
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Robert L. Hetzel,Too Big to Fail:Origins, Consequences, and Outlook, Economic Review, November/December 1991.
  • 2George G. Kaufman,Too big to fail in banking: What remains?The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 42 (2002) 423-436.
  • 3Xavier Freixas, Optimal Bail out policy, conditionality and constructive ambiguity.
  • 4Huberto M. Ennis and H. S. Malek,Bank Risk of Failure and the Too-Big-to-Fail Policy, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Quarterly Volume 91/2 Spring 2005.

同被引文献64

  • 1曹廷求,郑录军,于建霞.政府股东、银行治理与中小商业银行风险控制——以山东、河南两省为例的实证分析[J].金融研究,2006(6):99-108. 被引量:66
  • 2吴栋,周建平.资本要求和商业银行行为:中国大中型商业银行的实证分析[J].金融研究,2006(8):144-153. 被引量:74
  • 3张强,薛江华.对最后贷款人制度“太大而不能倒”法则的探析[J].金融与经济,2006(11):22-25. 被引量:2
  • 4索尔金.大而不倒[M].巴曙松,陈剑等译.北京:中国人民大学出版社.2010.
  • 5Aghion, P., P. Bolton and S. Fries (1999), "Optimal Design of Bank Bailouts: The Case of Transition Economies", Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, Vol.155, pp.51-70.
  • 6Ashcraft, A. t3.(2005), "Are Banks Really Special? New Evidence From the FDIC-Induced Failure of Healthy Banks". American Economic Review, 95(5): pp.1712- 1730.
  • 7Diamond, D.W., and P.H. Dybvig (1983), "Bank Runs, Deposit Insurance, and Liquidity". Journal of Political Economy, 91 (3): pp.401 -419.
  • 8Ennis, H. and H. S. Malek (2005), "Bank Risk of Failure and the Too--Big--to--Fail Policy," Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Quarterly, Vol. 91, pp. 21-44, Spring.
  • 9Hetzel, R. L. (1991), "Too Big to Fail: Origins, Consequences, and Outlook", Economic Review, November/December.
  • 10Hughes, J.P. and L-J- Mester (1993), "A Quality and Risk-adjusted Cost Function for Banks: Evidenc.e on the 'Too--Big--To-Fail'" , Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol.4, No.3, pp.293-315.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部