期刊文献+

宫颈巴氏涂片与液基细胞薄层技术(TCT)的比较分析 被引量:3

Comparing the conventional papanicolaou smear test with thinPrep cytology test department of obstetrics and gynecology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较宫颈巴氏涂片与液基细胞薄层技术(ThinPrep Cytology Test,TCT)在宫颈病变筛查中的作用。方法使用传统巴氏涂片和TCT同时对309名宫颈病变筛查妇女进行细胞学检查,对两种方法的标本满意度及细胞学检查结果进行比较。结果巴氏涂片标本满意度为94.5%,TCT标本满意度为99.03%,两者有显著性差异(P〈0.05)。阳性病变的检出率传统巴氏涂片为18,77%,(巴氏Ⅲ级及以上)。TCT为20.39%(非典型鳞状上皮或非典型腺上皮以上),两者无统计学差异(P〉0.05)。结论由于采用新的取材、制片方法,在标本满意度上,TCT比传统巴氏涂片有明显改善;在阳性病变的检出率上,TCT比传统巴氏涂片也有所改善;而传统巴氏涂片因具有经济、简便、快捷的优点,在经济落后地区推广有一定意义。可以尝试通过改进巴氏涂片的取材和制片方法,从而提高巴氏涂片的灵敏度和特异度。 Objective To Compare the conventional Papanicolaou smear test with ThinPrep cytology test (TCT) for cervical carcinoma screening. Methods 309 women received both Pap smear and TCT , compared their specimen satisfaction and cytological diagnosis result . Results The specimen satisfaction of Pap smear was 94.5%, while TCT was 99.03%, it increased respectively(P〈0.05). In the patients with Cervical lesions , the detective rate of Pap smear was 18.77% (they were diagnosed as Bethesda Ⅲ or up) , while that of TCT was 20.39%(they were diagnosed as atypical squamous cells or up), TCT increased mildly, there was no significance difference(P〉O. 05). Conclusions Because of new application in drawing material and smear-making, compared with conventional Pap smear, the specimen satisfaction of TCT improves obviously, the detective rate increases mildly. Since Pap smear is much cheaper, speedier and more convenient, it is worthy of popularizing in the backward area in our country. Therefore , we may try to change the means of drawing material and smear-making of Pap smear, so as to improve its sensitivity and specificity.
出处 《国际医药卫生导报》 2008年第6期68-70,共3页 International Medicine and Health Guidance News
关键词 巴氏涂片 液基细胞薄层技术 宫颈病变 Cervical lesions ThinPrep Cytology Test Pap smear
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献18

  • 1吴爱如.宫颈癌的早期诊断[J].中国肿瘤,1994,3(3):11-12. 被引量:8
  • 2Parkin Dm, Bray F, Devesa SS et al. Cancer burden in the year 2000:The global picture. Eur J Cancer,2001 Oct,37 (suppl 8):S4
  • 3Fattaneh A, Tavassoli PD. Pathology and Genetic of Tumours of the breast and Female Genital organs. Lyon IARC Press, 2003:262
  • 4Manos MM, Kinney WK, Hurley LB et al. Identifying women with cervical neoplasia: using human papillomavirus DNA testing for equivocal Papanicolaou results.JAMA, 1999, 281(17):1605
  • 5Prediction of 'high-risk' cervical papillomavirus infection by biopsy morphology. Am J Clin Pathol. 1989, 92(5):577
  • 6Solomon D. Bethesda System 2001. Acta Cytologica, 2002,46:6
  • 7马正中 刘树范.诊断细胞病理学[M].郑州:河南科学技术出版社,1998.281-465.
  • 8Frable WJ, Austin RM, Collins RJ, et al. Medicolegal affairs: IAC task force summary. Acta Cytol, 1998,42 ( 1 ) :76 - 119.
  • 9Hutchinson ML,Cassin CM ,Ball HG. The efficacy of an automated preparation device for cervical cytology. Am J Clin Pathol,1991,96(3) :300-305.
  • 10Sprenger E, Schwarzmann P, Kirkpatrick M, et al. The false negative rate in cervical cytology, Aeta Cytol, 1996,40 ( 1 ) :81 - 89,

共引文献1146

同被引文献18

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部