试论《屈原作品》作者的构筑

On Building "Qu Yuan's Work" Author

《屈原作品》是中国先秦时代古典文学精华的代表,作者誉称为中国诗祖,世界文化名人。可是,先秦时代的作品没有署名的习俗,《屈原作品》也不例外。我们没有任何证据能证明先秦时代的"屈原"是"人称",因为此时的中国尚未有"姓"的出现。中国"姓"产生于秦始皇建立户籍制度时,它比《屈原作品》形成的年代晚半个世纪。《屈原作品》记述的都是楚黔中郡"治理战乱根源和归属的历史文献",文献的内容是"屈(治理)原(根源和归属)",后人移花接木,让不是"人称"的"屈原"充当了失传的作者,起到了"歪打正着"的效果。司马迁为之立《传》,"屈原"便成了《屈原作品》法定的作者了。但后人构筑的"屈原"不等于《屈原作品》的作者,因为《屈原作品》的作者比构筑的"屈原"要伟大得多,他才是真正的中国诗祖,世界文化名人。

＂Qu Yuan＇s work＂ is the cream of classical literature in China Pre-Qin times.The author hailed as Chinese poetry ancestors, and the world cultural celebrities. However, in Pre-Qin times, they had no custom of anonymous for their work. ＂Qu Yuan＇s work＂ is no exception. We do not have any evidence to prove that ＂ QuYuan＂ is a surname, because there was no surname at that time in China. China＇s ＂surname＂ arising from the establishment of the household registration system during the period of the emperor Qing Shi-huang, it occurred later than ＂Qu Yuan＇s work＂ for half a century. ＂Qu Yuan＇s work＂ records some historical documents, the contents are about ＂Qu＂ and ＂Yuan＂, future generations take ＂Qu Yuan＂ as the writer. Si Ma Qian enacted ＂Biography＂ for it and ＂Qu Yuan＂ has become the author of ＂Qu Yuan＇s work＂. But the later ＂QuYuan＂ is not equal to the author of ＂Qu Yuan＇s work＂, because the author is much greater than ＂Qu Yuan＂, he is the true progenitor of the Chinese poetry, and world cultural celebrities.