期刊文献+

集体心理干预对儿童屈光参差性弱视治疗的影响 被引量:4

Efficacy of the Group Mental Intervention with Combined Therapy in the Treatment of Anisometropic Amblyopia in Children
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价集体心理干预治疗在屈光参差性弱视儿童中治疗的价值。方法:将门诊就诊的屈光参差性弱视儿童随机分为集体心理干预联合弱视综合治疗组(43例49眼),同期就诊的39例42眼行弱视综合治疗,作为对照组,观察起效时间、依从性及疗效。结果:集体心理干预治疗起效快于综合治疗(21.1±0.6天/30.5±3.3天,t=4.89,P<0.001)。治疗三月后,集体心理干预组依从性良好的有79.1%(34/43),综合治疗组依从性良好的有53.8%(21/39),集体心理干预治疗的依从性好于综合治疗组(χ2=5.892,P=0.015)。治疗六月后,两组有效率差异无统计学意义(92%/83%,χ2=1.539,P=0.215)。但集体心理干预治疗组的治愈率为高于综合治疗组(27%(13/49)/7%(3/42),χ2=5.866,P=0.015)。结论:集体心理干预治疗可以提高屈光参差性弱视治疗的依从性,缩短疗程,提高治愈率。 Objective: To explore the role of group intervention in the treatment of children with anisometropic amblyopia. Method: Children with anisometropic amblyopia were randomly divided into intervention group ( 42 eyes of 39 cases ) and control group (49eyes of 43 cases) . The intervention group received group intervention for six months to improve their compliance to regular combined therapy. The time of getting improved, compliance and visual acuity were used as indications to assess the outcome. Results: The time of getting improved was shorter in the intervention group ( 21. 1 ± 0.6d/30. 5 ± 3.3d, t = 4. 89, P 〈 0. 001 ) . 79% children in intervention group ( 34/43 ) were rated as having good compliance, which was better than control (53% , X2 = 5. 892, P =0. 015 ) . The cure rate of intervention group was 27% ( 13/49 ) , higher than that of control ( 7%, 3/42, X^2 = 5. 866, P = 0. 015 ) . Conclusion : Group intervention can improve the compliance, hasten improving and raise the cure rate of children with anisometropic amblyopia.
作者 赵勇洁
出处 《中国心理卫生杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2007年第5期350-352,共3页 Chinese Mental Health Journal
关键词 屈光参差性弱视 儿童 集体心理干预 病例对照研究 依从性 疗效 anisometropic amblyopia children group intervention case-control study the compliance efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献13

  • 1甘晓玲.弱视的定义、分类及疗效评价标准[J].中国斜视与小儿眼科杂志,1996,4(3):97-97. 被引量:1014
  • 2田桂芬,王瑾婷.传统遮盖法治疗儿童弱视的远期疗效观察[J].中国斜视与小儿眼科杂志,1994,2(1):30-31. 被引量:9
  • 3赫雨时.压抑疗法治疗弱视的临床观察[J].中华眼科杂志,1982,18(3):133-133.
  • 4李琳,潘秀华.传统遮盖对儿童弱视的疗效观察[J].中国斜视与小儿眼科杂志,1997,5(1):30-31. 被引量:19
  • 5Kaye SB, Chen SI, Price G, et al. Combined optical and atropine penalization for the treatment of strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia. J AAPOS, 2002, 6 (5): 289-293
  • 6Simons K, Stein L, Sener EC, et al. Full time atropine, intermittent atropine, and optical penalization and binocular outcome in treatment of strabismic amblyopia. Ophthalmology, 1997, 104 (12): 2143-2155
  • 7Repka MX, Cotte SA, Beck RW, et al. A randomized trial of atropine regimens for treatment moderate amblyopia in children. Ophthalrmology, 2004, 111 (11): 2076-2085
  • 8Mittelman D. Amblyopa. Pediatr Clin North Am, 2003, 50 (1):189 - 196
  • 9Hussein MA, Coats DK, Muthialu A, et al. Risk factor for treatment failure of anisometropic amblyopia. J AAPOS, 2004, 8 (5):429 - 434
  • 10Mazow ML, Chuang A, Vital MC, et al. 1999 Costenbader Lecture. Outcome study in amblyopia: treatment and practice pattern variations. J AAPOS, 2000, 4 (1): 1-9

共引文献50

同被引文献35

引证文献4

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部